Why would it be economically efficient to require a natural monopoly to charge a price equal to marginal cost? Why do most regulatory agencies require natural monopolies to charge a price equal to average cost instead?

Short Answer

Expert verified
It would be economically efficient to set prices equal to the marginal cost because it leads to optimal resource allocation, with consumers paying the exact cost of producing an additional unit. But, due to high fixed costs in natural monopolies, marginal cost is often lesser than average cost, leading to economic losses under marginal cost pricing. Hence, regulatory agencies generally require prices to be set at average cost, ensuring that the monopoly can cover all its costs and continue operating sustainably.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Natural Monopoly and Marginal Cost Pricing

A natural monopoly exists when a single firm can service the entire market demand at a lower cost than what it would be if there were multiple firms. Marginal cost is the added cost of producing one additional unit. If the price charged is equal to the marginal cost, then it is economically efficient because consumers are paying exactly the cost of producing an additional unit, allowing for optimal resource allocation.
02

The Predicament with Marginal Cost Pricing for Natural Monopolies

While economically efficient, the problem with a natural monopoly charging cost equal to marginal cost arises when the marginal cost is less than the average cost. This situation frequently occurs in natural monopolies due to high fixed costs and relatively low variable costs, resulting in continually decreasing average costs. If the price-setting is done at the level of marginal cost, the monopoly might not be able to fully cover its costs, leading to economic losses.
03

Reason for Regulatory Agencies favoring Average Cost Pricing

Regulatory bodies usually ask natural monopolies to price their goods or services at the level of their average cost. This ensures that monopolies can cover all their costs (fixed and variable) by balancing lower prices (due to high fixed costs) with higher ones (from variable costs). Hence, while this may not necessarily be pareto efficient as the marginal-cost pricing, it permits the firm to sustainably operate, thereby guaranteeing service provision.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does a monopolist have a supply curve? Briefly explain. (Hint: Look again at the definition of a supply curve in Chapter 3 on page 83 and consider whether this definition applies to a monopolist.)

For most of the 1800 s, the United States did not recognize the copyrights of books written by foreign authors. As a result, many U.S. publishers printed "pirated"unauthorized- editions of Charles Dickens and other British authors without paying them royalties. A history of book publishing noted, “[U.S.] publishers claimed that pirating [foreign] works allowed their prices to remain low, which in turn made the works more accessible to the public at large." There were (eventually successful) attempts in Congress to recognize foreign copyrights in exchange for other countries recognizing U.S. copyrights. At the time, one U.S. publisher described these efforts as the "clamor of two hundred authors against the interests of fifty-five million people." Do copyright laws benefit authors at the expense of readers? If so, why does the U.S. Constitution give Congress the right to enact copyright laws?

In discussing the NCAA, the late Nobel Laureate Gary Becker, an economist, wrote, "It is impossible for an outsider to look at these [NCAA] rules without concluding that their main aim is to make the NCAA an effective cartel that severely constrains competition among schools for players." a. What is a cartel? In what ways does the NCAA act like a cartel? b. Who gains and who loses as a result of the NCAA acting like a cartel? If you are a student who does not play intercollegiate sports but who is enrolled at a school with prominent sports teams, such as the University of Alabama or Ohio State University, does the NCAA acting as a cartel make you better off or worse off? Briefly explain.

Will a monopoly that maximizes profit also be maximizing revenue? Will it be maximizing output? Briefly explain.

The German company Koenig \& Bauer has 90 percent of the world market for presses that print currency. Discuss the factors that would make it difficult for new companies to enter this market.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free