Harvard Business School started using case studiesdescriptions of strategic problems encountered at real companies-in courses in 1912. Today, Harvard Business Publishing (HBP) sells its case studies to about 4,000 colleges worldwide. HBP is the sole publisher of Harvard Business School's case studies. What criteria would you use to determine whether HBP has a monopoly on the sale of business case studies to be used in college courses?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The criteria that could be used to check if HBP has a monopoly would include determining if HBP is the single seller, if the business case studies they sell are unique and without close substitutes, if there are high barriers preventing other potential competitors from entering the market, and whether HBP has the power to set prices without considering competition.

Step by step solution

01

Single Seller

One main criterion for a monopoly is that the entity should be the single seller in the market. In this case, to determine whether HBP has a monopoly, it should be ascertained first if HBP is the only seller of business case studies for use in college courses. The exercise mentions that HBP sells to about 4,000 colleges, but it does not specify that it is the only entity doing so.
02

Unique Product

Monopolies often involve exclusive control of a unique product. Here, it would need to be determined if the case studies that HBP sells are unique and have no close substitutes. Given the statement that HBP is the sole publisher of Harvard Business School's case studies, one can argue that their product is unique.
03

Barriers to Entry

In a monopoly, there are high entry barriers that prevent other potential competitors from entering the market. In this scenario, the query would be if there are high barriers that prevent other publishers from publishing and selling similar business case studies. Factors could include access to the studies, copyright laws, and the reputation and credibility of Harvard Business School.
04

Price Maker

Lastly, in a monopoly, the monopolist is a 'price maker', meaning they can dictate pricing due to the lack of competition. It would be necessary to establish if HBP is able to set prices for its case studies without considering the competition.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Market Structure
Understanding the market structure is fundamental in assessing competition and the potential for monopoly in a given industry. Market structure refers to the characteristics and dynamics of a market, including the number of firms, the nature of products, and the level of competition. There are several types of market structures, including perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly.

A monopoly market structure features a single seller offering a unique product or service with no close substitutes. This enables the monopolist to exert significant control over the market, particularly in terms of pricing and supply. The case in point with Harvard Business Publishing illustrates a unique market where a single entity, HBP, sells Harvard Business School's case studies. In assessing whether this constitutes a monopoly, one must analyze not just the presence of other sellers, but also the distinctiveness of the product offered and the ease with which new competitors could enter the market.
Single Seller Criterion
The single seller criterion is a key component of a monopoly. To be considered a monopoly, a market must be dominated by one firm that is the sole provider of a particular product or service. This firm, the monopolist, usually has no significant competition.

In the context of Harvard Business Publishing, this would necessitate confirming if HBP is indeed the exclusive seller of Harvard case studies to colleges. If no other publisher has access to Harvard's content or the right to distribute it, HBP could be fulfilling the single seller criterion. However, merely selling to a large number of colleges does not alone signify a monopoly unless it is established that HBP is the only source of these specific educational materials.
Barriers to Entry in Market
A hallmark of a monopoly is the existence of significant barriers to entry that prevent or discourage new competitors from entering the market. These barriers can be legal, technological, structural, or related to resource control.

For instance, HBP's possible monopoly on Harvard case studies could stem from exclusive rights through copyright laws, which would be a legal barrier to entry. Access to Harvard's extensive library of case studies and their esteemed reputation could constitute structural and resource-based barriers. Potential competitors may find it extremely challenging to replicate or obtain the rights to similar materials, solidifying HBP's dominant market position if other conditions of a monopoly are met.
Price Maker Characteristic
Another defining feature of a monopoly is the price maker characteristic. A price maker holds the power to set prices for their goods or services without having to take competitors' prices into account, as competition is absent or minimal.

To evaluate this in regards to HBP, one would need to investigate their pricing strategy. If HBP has the autonomy to dictate the prices of their case studies irrespective of market forces due to a lack of viable alternative products, then this would strengthen the argument that they have a monopoly. Essentially, if HBP can charge higher prices because schools have few if any, alternatives for similar quality case studies, it suggests they are operating as a price maker.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is "natural" about a natural monopoly?

Food service firms buy meat, vegetables, and other foods and resell them to restaurants, schools, and hospitals. US Foods and Sysco are by far the largest firms in the industry. In 2015 , these firms were attempting to merge to form a single firm. A news story quoted one restaurant owner as saying, "There was definite panic in the restaurant industry \(\ldots\) when the merger was announced. They know they're going to get squeezed." a. Analyze the effect on the food service market of US Foods and Sysco combining. Draw a graph to illustrate your answer. For simplicity, assume that the market was perfectly competitive before the firms combined and would be a monopoly afterward. Be sure your graph shows changes in the equilibrium price, the equilibrium quantity, consumer surplus, producer surplus, and deadweight loss. b. Why would restaurant owners believe they would be "squeezed" by this development? c. Ultimately, the merger did not occur because the Federal Trade Commission was successful in suing to stop it. The judge who decided the case wrote, "The proposed merger of the country's first and second largest broadline foodservice distributors is likely to cause the type of industry concentration that Congress sought to curb at the outset before it harmed competition." Briefly explain what the judge meant by "industry concentration" and what the results will be of a merger that harms competition.

An article in the Wall Street Journal quoted a DOJ antitrust official as saying, "Mergers between substantial competitors, especially in already concentrated industries, can give companies far too much power over the markets in which they operate." a. What does the official mean by a "concentrated industry"? b. What does he mean by "power over the markets in which they operate"? c. The article also quoted the official as saying that mergers might benefit the public "when they bring together complementary assets, people and ideas that help lower production costs or spur greater innovation." Will these positive aspects of a merger always be enough to offset the negative aspects you discussed in answering part (b) of this problem? Briefly explain.

In discussing the NCAA, the late Nobel Laureate Gary Becker, an economist, wrote, "It is impossible for an outsider to look at these [NCAA] rules without concluding that their main aim is to make the NCAA an effective cartel that severely constrains competition among schools for players." a. What is a cartel? In what ways does the NCAA act like a cartel? b. Who gains and who loses as a result of the NCAA acting like a cartel? If you are a student who does not play intercollegiate sports but who is enrolled at a school with prominent sports teams, such as the University of Alabama or Ohio State University, does the NCAA acting as a cartel make you better off or worse off? Briefly explain.

The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) is a monopoly because the federal government has blocked entry into the market for delivering first-class mail. Is the USPS also a natural monopoly? How can we tell? What would happen if the law preventing competition in this market were removed?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free