Does a monopolist have a supply curve? Briefly explain. (Hint: Look again at the definition of a supply curve in Chapter 3 on page 83 and consider whether this definition applies to a monopolist.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, a monopolist does not have a supply curve because they can set both the price and quantity of production, contrary to the definition of a supply curve where the price is taken as given and drives the quantity supplied. The monopolist's decisions are based on maximizing their own profit rather than market conditions.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Nature of Monopolies

A monopolist is a producer who has full control over the production and selling of a particular good or service. Unlike firms in competitive markets, a monopolist does not take the market price as given. Instead, they decide the output quantity and the market price.
02

Reviewing the Concept of Supply Curve

A supply curve is a graphical representation of the relationship between the price of a good or service and the quantity supplied for a given period. It is upward sloping, indicating that higher prices incentivize producers to produce more.
03

Applying the Definition of Supply Curve to Monopolies

Due to the characteristics of a monopoly, the monopolist's decision on the quantity to produce and what price to charge does not depend on the market price. Thus, the monopolist doesn't have a supply curve. This is because their output decision is entirely based on maximizing their profit, meaning price and output are directly determined by the monopolist rather than market conditions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Monopolist
A monopolist represents a unique player in the field of economics, occupying a singular position as the sole provider of a specific good or service within the market. Unlike competitors in a multi-firm marketplace, a monopolist does not contend with direct competition, allowing them to exert unparalleled influence over their product's price and production volume.

To fully appreciate the monopolist's role, one should recognize their ability to adjust not only how much of a product they produce but also the price at which it's sold. This stands in contrast to companies in perfectly competitive markets, who are 'price takers' and must accept the market equilibrium price. Monopolists are described as 'price makers,' indicating their capacity to set prices based on their production choices and strategic objectives. This concept is paramount as it sets the stage for understanding market price determination and the complexities of the supply curve in a monopoly.
Market Price Determination
The process of market price determination in the case of a monopolist is distinct from that in competitive markets. While competitive firms adjust their output levels in response to the market price to maximize profits, a monopolist has the liberty to dictate the price itself by choosing their preferred point on the demand curve.

For instance, a monopolist might analyze their total costs and the market's demand for their product to determine the most profitable production quantity. Once that quantity is decided, the monopolist then exercises their power to set a price that consumers are willing to pay, taking into account the absence of substitutes and competitors. This level of control allows the monopolist to balance their desire for profit maximization against the risk of setting prices too high, which could deter consumers and reduce demand.
Supply Curve Definition
Traditionally, the supply curve is an essential tool used in economics to represent the relationship between the price of a good or service and the amount of it that producers are willing and able to supply in the market. Defined with an upward slope in competitive markets, the curve illustrates that higher prices typically incentivize producers to increase supply due to the prospect of increased revenue.

Understanding the Supply Curve in Monopoly

When applying the standard definition of a supply curve to monopolies, a contradiction appears: monopolists set their prices and quantities based on the maximization of profits, not in reaction to the market. As a result, there isn't a one-to-one correspondence between price and quantity supplied that can be graphically depicted as a traditional supply curve. Instead, the monopolist’s behavior is better represented by the demand curve, their marginal cost, and marginal revenue curves, which intersect to indicate the optimal price and quantity to maximize profits. Therefore, the lack of a traditional supply curve is a key aspect of what makes monopolies unique within the marketplace.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In China, the government owns many more firms than do governments in the United States. A former Chinese government official argued that a number of government-run industries such as oil refining were natural monopolies. Is it likely that oil refining is a natural monopoly? How would you be able to tell?

An article in the Wall Street Journal, discussing large hightech firms such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, stated, "Today's high-tech giants may not be monopolies in the most classic sense.... [Demand] for technology products and services keeps increasing.... That leaves a lot of potential upside for a small group of big players that already have demonstrated that scale matters." a. Why would high-technology firms not be considered monopolies in the "classic sense"? b. Why would the article state that for the most profitable high-technology firms, "scale matters"?

An article in the Wall Street Journal quoted a DOJ antitrust official as saying, "Mergers between substantial competitors, especially in already concentrated industries, can give companies far too much power over the markets in which they operate." a. What does the official mean by a "concentrated industry"? b. What does he mean by "power over the markets in which they operate"? c. The article also quoted the official as saying that mergers might benefit the public "when they bring together complementary assets, people and ideas that help lower production costs or spur greater innovation." Will these positive aspects of a merger always be enough to offset the negative aspects you discussed in answering part (b) of this problem? Briefly explain.

In a magazine article, a writer explained that the provision of electric power in the United States consists of two processes: the generation of electricity and the distribution of electricity. The writer argued that "power distribution is a natural monopoly.... But ... there's \(\ldots\) no reason why the people who generate the electricity \(\ldots\) should be the same people who own the power lines." a. Why would the distribution of electric power be a natural monopoly? b. Why would the generation of electric power not be a natural monopoly?

The German company Koenig \& Bauer has 90 percent of the world market for presses that print currency. Discuss the factors that would make it difficult for new companies to enter this market.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free