An article in the Wall Street Journal gave the following explanation of how products were traditionally priced at Parker Hannifin Corporation: For as long as anyone at the 89 -year-old company could recall, Parker used the same simple formula to determine prices of its 800,000 parts-from heat- resistant seals for jet engines to steel valves that hoist buckets on cherry pickers. Company managers would calculate how much it cost to make and deliver each product and add a flat percentage on top, usually aiming for about \(35 \% .\) Many managers liked the method because it was straightforward. Is it likely that this system of pricing maximized the firm's profit? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, it is not likely that this system of pricing maximized the firm's profit. To maximize profits, a firm should set its price and output where its marginal revenue equals its marginal cost (MR=MC). The method used by the corporation does not consider this principle.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Pricing Method

In the case of Parker Hannifin Corporation, they calculate how much it costs to make and deliver each product and then add a flat percentage on top, usually aiming for about 35%. This method of pricing is straightforward but it is not aimed at maximizing profits.
02

Understand Profit Maximization Concept

To maximize profits, a firm needs to set its output and price level where its marginal revenue equals its marginal cost (MR=MC). This is because at this point the cost of producing one more unit equals the revenue gained from selling that unit, leading to highest possible profit.
03

Compare the pricing methods

Considering the method used by the corporation, it can be noted that they do not take into account the demand, market conditions and the principle of MR=MC. They only use the cost of production to set their prices, this can lead to a situation where the price set does not allow them to sell enough units to achieve profit maximization. In contrast, if the firm would set its prices and output according to the MR=MC principle, it could adapt to changes in the market and potentially sell more units, thus maximizing its profits.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Pricing Strategy
Pricing strategy is a crucial component of a firm's overall business plan. It determines how a company prices its products or services to balance profitability with customer satisfaction and competitive dynamics.

At its most basic, pricing can be either cost-plus, which involves adding a standard markup to the cost of producing a good, or value-based, which sets prices primarily on the perceived value to customers rather than on cost. For Parker Hannifin Corporation, as mentioned, their strategy was straightforward cost-plus pricing—calculating the cost of production and delivery, and adding a flat 35% margin.

However, this does not necessarily align with profit maximization, as it doesn't account for consumer demand elasticity, competitor prices, and market variations, which are critical. Companies often adopt different strategies such as premium pricing, penetration pricing, economy pricing, and price skimming depending on their objectives and market conditions.
The Role of Marginal Revenue in Profit Maximization
Marginal revenue (MR) refers to the additional income generated from selling one more unit of a product or service. It's a concept rooted deeply in microeconomics and is central to understanding profit maximization.

The relationship between MR and output level is pivotal because it helps determine the most advantageous point of production. Optimally, a firm should continue to produce and sell additional units as long as the marginal revenue of selling those units exceeds the marginal cost (MC) of producing them.

Profit Maximization and MR

Profit maximization occurs when a firm finds the sweet spot where MR equals MC. At this point, the revenue from selling an additional unit precisely covers the cost of making it, and there's no financial benefit in increasing or decreasing the production level. Any deviation from this delicate balance can lead to decreased profits.
Marginal Cost's Impact on Pricing
Marginal cost is the cost of producing one additional unit of a product. Understanding MC is essential for setting the right production levels and pricing for profit maximization.

When the marginal cost is lower than the marginal revenue, the firm can potentially increase production to boost profits. However, as output increases, MC might also rise due to factors like overtime pay or the need to source more expensive inputs.

Cost-Plus vs. Marginal-Cost Pricing

Unlike the cost-plus method used by Parker Hannifin Corporation, marginal-cost pricing would involve setting prices based on the changing costs of production and could better correspond to achieving maximum profit, as it allows the firm to adjust prices according to the incremental cost of producing more goods.
Market Conditions' Influence on Pricing and Profit
Market conditions encompass demand and supply dynamics, competitor behavior, and external factors that affect a business's pricing decisions and profitability. For firms to maximize profits, it's critical to consider these conditions while establishing prices.

In varying market conditions, customer preferences and competitors' actions can influence demand and the ideal price point. For instance, in a highly competitive market, a business may opt for a penetration pricing strategy, setting lower initial prices to gain market share quickly.

Dynamic Pricing in Response to Market Conditions

Dynamic pricing is another strategy where prices are adjusted in real time based on market demand and supply variances. This approach contrasts with Parker Hannifin's static cost-plus strategy and could be more effective in adapting to market fluctuations and maximizing profits.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Many supermarkets provide regular shoppers with "loyalty cards." By swiping the card when checking out, a shopper receives reduced prices on a few goods, and the supermarket compiles information on all the shoppers' purchases. Some supermarkets have switched from giving the same price reductions to all shoppers to giving shoppers differing price reductions depending on their shopping history. A manager at one supermarket that uses this approach said, "It comes down to understanding elasticity at a household level." a. Is the use of loyalty cards that provide the same price discounts for every shopper who uses them a form of price discrimination? Briefly explain. b. Why would making price discounts depend on a shopper's buying history involve "understanding elasticity at a household level"? What information from a shopper's buying history would be relevant in predicting the shopper's response to a price discount?

In early \(2017,\) a headline in the Wall Street Journal read: "Pricey Virtual- Reality Headsets Slow to Catch On." Is it possible that Sony, Facebook, and the other firms producing virtual-reality headsets were better off keeping prices high when initially offering them for sale, even if the result was a smaller quantity sold? Briefly explain.

Instacart is a Web-based firm that offers home delivery of groceries. It buys the groceries in regular brick-and-mortar supermarkets, marks up the prices it pays, and then charges consumers the higher prices in exchange for making home deliveries. According to an article in the Wall Street Journal, Instacart marks up the price of potato chips by 26 percent, but it marks up the price of eggs by only 2.5 percent. Is it likely that Instacart believes that the demand for potato chips is more elastic or less elastic than the demand for eggs? Briefly explain.

During the nineteenth century, the U.S. Congress encouraged railroad companies to build transcontinental railways across the Great Plains by giving them land grants. At that time, the federal government owned most of the land on the Great Plains. The land grants consisted of the land on which the railway was built and alternating sections of 1 square mile each on either side of the railway to a distance of 6 to 40 miles, depending on the location. The railroad companies were free to sell this land to farmers or anyone else who wanted to buy it. The process of selling the land took decades. Some economic historians have argued that the railroad companies charged lower prices to ship freight because they owned so much land along the tracks. Briefly explain the reasoning of these economic historians.

Prices for many goods are higher in the city of Shenzhen on the mainland of China than in the city of Hong Kong. An article in the Economist noted that "individuals can arbitrage these differences through what effectively amounts to smuggling." a. Explain what the article means when it notes that individuals can "arbitrage these price differences." b. Ultimately, what would you expect the result to be of individuals engaging in this arbitrage? Is your answer affected by the fact that the government of China requires a visa for Shenzhen residents to visit Hong Kong and regulates the number of trips that can be made between the two cities in a given year? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free