What is the marginal productivity theory of income distribution?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Marginal Productivity Theory of Income Distribution states that in a competitive market, factors of productions would achieve payment equivalent to the marginal productivity they contribute. Its implications suggest an equitable distribution of income assuming perfect market conditions which, however, are rarely met in real-world scenarios.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding basic concepts

First, understand the meaning of marginal productivity. Marginal productivity is the extra output that an additional unit of an input can produce when all other factors are constant. In this context, we are talking about the distribution of income amongst different factors like labor, capital, land, entrepreneurship.
02

The Principle of the Theory

Secondly, understand the principle of the Marginal Productivity Theory of Income Distribution. Essentially, it states that in a free market, each factor involved in the production process is paid according to the value of its marginal output. That is, each factor is rewarded according to the value of the product the last unit of the factor produced.
03

The Implication of the Theory

Lastly, examine the implications of the theory. In a perfectly competitive marketplace, the theory suggests that income is distributed equitably, as there exists a direct relationship between a factor's remuneration and its productivity. However, in the real world, marketplace distortions like monopolistic conditions and market imperfections introduce inequalities in income distribution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Research by economists Susan Helper, Morris Kleiner, and Yingchun Wang found that the use of pay-forperformance, or piece-rate pay, has declined in manufacturing industries in recent decades. In a summary of this research, Lester Picker explained, “This change has come about with the adoption of modern manufacturing systems in which firms produce a greater variety of products to a more demanding quality and delivery standard." a. What characteristics determine whether a salary system or a piece-rate system is likely to be more profitable for a manufacturing firm? b. Why would modern systems "in which firms produce a greater variety of products to a more demanding quality and delivery standard" than manufacturers used previously result in firms choosing to pay their workers salaries rather than use piece rates?

Suppose that a large oil field is discovered in Michigan. By imposing a tax on the oil, the state government is able to eliminate the state income tax on wages. What is likely to be the effect on the labor supply curve in Michigan?

An article in the Wall Street Journal on the use of driverless trucks at Rio Tinto's Australian mines observed, "The new equipment cut many driving jobs. ... But the reductions will be partly offset by new types of work. The company now needs more network technicians \(\ldots\) a hybrid of electrical and mechanical engineering that hardly existed five years ago." Is it likely that total employment at Rio Tinto's mines will have increased or decreased as a result of its use of robots? Are the average wages Rio Tinto pays likely to be higher or lower? Are the wages of the truck drivers who were replaced by robots likely to end up higher or lower in the drivers' new jobs? Briefly explain

What are the three most important variables that cause the market supply curve of labor to shift?

Baseball writer Rany Jazayerli assessed then Kansas City Royals outfielder Jose Guillen as follows: "Guillen has negative value the way his contract stands." How could a baseball player's contract cause him to have negative value to a baseball team?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free