(Related to Solved Problem 18.3 on page 616 ) Explain whether you agree with the following statement: "For a given demand curve, the excess burden of a tax will be greater when supply is less price elastic than when it is more price elastic." Illustrate your answer with a demand and supply graph.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, one would agree with the statement. For a given demand curve, when supply is less price elastic (inelastic), the excess burden of a tax or deadweight loss is indeed greater. This is because, with an inelastic supply, sellers bear a larger share of the tax burden and significantly decrease their production, leading to a larger welfare loss to society than when supply is more price-elastic.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Basic Concepts

The demand curve in economics shows how the quantity of a good or service varies with its price. Elasticity refers to a measure of the responsiveness of quantity demanded or quantity supplied to a change in one of its determinants. Excess burden of tax, also known as deadweight loss, refers to the cost to society created by market inefficiency.
02

Analyze the Statement

Now, let's analyze the given statement: 'For a given demand curve, the excess burden of a tax will be greater when supply is less price elastic than when it is more price elastic.' It means if the supply is inelastic (less responsive to price changes), then the deadweight loss of a tax is larger.
03

Reasoning the Statement

A tax imposed on a market with inelastic supply will distort the market outcome more, resulting in a larger deadweight loss to society. The tax creates a wedge between the price buyers pay and the price sellers receive, regardless of elasticity. However, when supply is inelastic, sellers bear a larger share of the tax burden and decrease their production significantly. This reduces total welfare by more.
04

Illustration

To illustrate this, draw two graphs showing demand and supply before and after tax. In the case of inelastic supply, the supply curve will be steeper, and the area representing the deadweight loss (excess burden) will be larger compared to more elastic supply.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Demand Curve
Understanding the demand curve is fundamental when studying the impacts of taxation on a market. It represents the relationship between the price of a goods or service and the quantity demanded by consumers at various price levels. Typically, the curve slopes downwards, reflecting the law of demand: as the price of a product decreases, consumers are willing to purchase more, and vice versa.

In the context of taxation, the demand curve helps us analyze how consumer behavior might change in response to a tax imposed on a good, influencing the overall quantity demanded within the market. This relationship is crucial for evaluating the excess burden of a tax, as taxes can lead to a decrease in the quantity demanded, which in turn affects market efficiency and welfare.
Price Elasticity
Price elasticity is a measure of how much the quantity demanded or supplied of a good responds to a change in its price. Specifically, it gauges the sensitivity of consumers or producers to price adjustments. Price elasticity is categorized as either elastic, inelastic, or unitary.

Elastic demand or supply means that the quantity demanded or supplied changes significantly due to price changes. In contrast, inelastic demand or supply indicates that the quantity is relatively unresponsive to price. This concept is pivotal when analyzing tax incidence and deadweight loss because the elasticity of supply and demand will influence how the tax affects market outcomes and distribution of economic welfare.
Deadweight Loss
Deadweight loss is a critical concept in economics, representing the loss of economic efficiency when the equilibrium for a good or service is not achieved or is unachievable. Taxes can cause markets to become inefficient by creating a discrepancy between the consumers' willingness to pay and the producers' costs, leading to a reduction in the overall quantity traded.

When a tax is levied, it can result in a deadweight loss especially if the market is distorted significantly from its equilibrium. For instance, when a good with inelastic supply is taxed, the quantity traded could drop substantially, resulting in a larger deadweight loss as the tax severely affects production and consumption decisions, deviating from the optimal market outcome.
Market Inefficiency
Market inefficiency occurs when resources are not allocated optimally, leading to missed opportunities for gains in trade. In an efficient market, every transaction would maximize buyer and seller satisfaction without any unexploited opportunities for further exchange. Taxes, however, can introduce inefficiencies by preventing markets from reaching this optimal allocation of resources.

The excess burden of a tax is a direct result of such inefficiencies. It measures the cost to society in lost utility or economic welfare, as taxes can both decrease consumer surplus, which is the benefit obtained from purchasing a good or service, and producer surplus, which is the benefit sellers receive from selling the good.
Tax Incidence
Tax incidence examines which group, consumers or producers, bears the burden of a tax. It doesn't solely depend on who legally pays the tax but rather on the relative elasticities of demand and supply. When supply is inelastic, producers find it harder to pass the tax onto consumers, and therefore bear most of the tax burden. In contrast, when demand is inelastic, consumers tend to bear a greater share of the tax.

The distribution of tax incidence has significant implications for equity and market outcomes. By understanding who is most affected by taxes, policy makers can make informed decisions about taxation strategies and anticipate potential changes in market behavior that result from new or adjusted taxes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Briefly explain whether you agree with the following argument: The median voter theorem will be an accurate predictor of the outcomes of elections when a majority of voters have preferences very similar to those of the median voter. When the majority of voters have preferences very different from those of the median voter, the median voter theorem will not lead to accurate predictions of the outcomes of elections.

Jason Furman served as the chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers under President Obama. In an opinion column in the Wall Street Journal discussing President Trump's tax reform proposal, Furman noted the need "for seriously revamping America's inefficient business-tax system to unlock stronger economic growth." But he also observed that tax reform is even more difficult than reforming the health care system "since it touches a larger fraction of the economy and threatens more powerful vested interests." a. Briefly explain what Furman means by "powerful vested interests." b. If tax reform leads to stronger economic growth, shouldn't a majority of Congress support it even if vested interests oppose the reform? Why then has tax reform legislation been difficult for Congress to pass?

Briefly discuss the effect of price elasticity of supply and demand on tax incidence.

What is the difference between a marginal tax rate and an average tax rate? Which is more important in determining the effect of a change in taxes on economic behavior?

An article describing the work of James Buchanan observed, "Buchanan and other public choice theorists altered the debate by proposing that government may not really correct problems in the marketplace because of the wealth trading, or rent seeking, that occurs during the legislative process." The same article included the following statement by Buchanan: "I was greatly influenced by Knut Wicksell's admonition that economists cease acting as if government were a benevolent despot." a. Explain why James Buchanan and other public choice economists believed that government policymakers do not act as "benevolent despots." b. Why would "rent seeking" be an impediment to government attempts to correct "problems in the marketplace"?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free