What is a production possibilities frontier? How can we show efficiency on a production possibilities frontier? How can we show inefficiency? What causes a production possibilities frontier to shift outward?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF) is a model showing the trade-off between the production of two goods. Efficiency is shown by points on the PPF curve, while inefficiency is indicated by points inside the curve. An outward shift of the PPF reflects economic growth, which can be caused by factors such as increased workforce, improved technology, or increased capital.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction to Production Possibilities Frontier

The Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF) is a model in economics that illustrates the trade-offs facing an economy that produces only two goods. It shows the maximum quantity of one good that can be produced for each possible quantity of the other good. The PPF is typically depicted as outward-bending, reflecting the principle of increasing opportunity cost.
02

Showing Efficiency on PPF

A point is considered efficient on the PPF when resources are utilized in a way that maximizes the production of both goods. This means there is no way to produce more of one good without reducing the production of the other good. On a diagram, points on the PPF curve represent efficient levels of production.
03

Showing Inefficiency on PPF

Inefficiency on the PPF is indicated by points inside the curve. This means the economy could produce more of at least one good without reducing the production of the other good, suggesting resources are not being fully utilized.
04

Causes of Outward Shift of PPF

An outward shift of the PPF represents economic growth. This can be caused by various factors, such as an increase in a nation's labor force, an improvement in technology, or an increase in capital (e.g., tools, machinery).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is absolute advantage? What is comparative advantage? Is it possible for a country to have a comparative advantage in producing a good without also having an absolute advantage? Briefly explain.

After Russia seized what had formerly been the Ukrainian territory of Crimea in February \(2014,\) the United States and many other countries imposed economic sanctions that reduced the ability of Russia to engage in international trade. A columnist writing in the New York Times noted, "If sanctions push Russia onto a path of greater self-reliance, its manufacturing and service industries will surely grow faster." If the columnist is correct about the effect of the sanctions, are the sanctions likely to improve the economic well-being of the average Russian in the long run? Briefly explain.

State government Medicaid programs provide medical insurance to poor and disabled people. A news article described a new prescription drug that costs as much as "\$ 94,000 for one 12 -week treatment regimen" to treat hepatitis \(\mathrm{C}\), a liver disease. Several states restricted access to the new drug under their Medicaid programs to patients who are most acutely ill (stage 3 or stage 4\()\) with hepatitis C. State Medicaid programs are paid for, in part, out of state budgets. What trade-offs do state governments face when new prescription drugs are introduced with much higher prices than existing drugs? Do you agree with states providing expensive new drugs only to the patients who are most ill from a disease? Briefly explain.

During the 1928 U.S. presidential election campaign, Herbert Hoover, the Republican candidate, argued that the United States should import only products that could not be produced here. Briefly explain whether this policy would be likely to raise average income in the United States.

In The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and his other books about the Land of \(\mathrm{Oz}, \mathrm{L}\). Frank Baum observed that if people's wants were limited enough, most goods would not be scarce. According to Baum, this was the case in Oz: There were no poor people in the Land of \(\mathrm{Oz}\), because there was no such thing as money.... Each person was given freely by his neighbors whatever he required for his use, which is as much as anyone may reasonably desire. Some tilled the lands and raised great crops of grain, which was divided equally among the whole population, so that all had enough. There were many tailors and dressmakers and shoemakers and the like, who made things that any who desired them might wear. Likewise there were jewelers who made ornaments for the person, which pleased and beautified the people, and these ornaments also were free to those who asked for them. Each man and woman, no matter what he or she produced for the good of the community, was supplied by the neighbors with food and clothing and a house and furniture and ornaments and games. If by chance the supply ever ran short, more was taken from the great storehouses of the Ruler, which were afterward filled up again when there was more of any article than people needed.... You will know, by what I have told you here, that the Land of Oz was a remarkable country. I do not suppose such an arrangement would be practical with us. Briefly explain whether you agree with Baum that the economic system in Oz wouldn't work in the contemporary United States.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free