A column in the Wall Street Journal considered two observations about the U.S. economy: "We live in an era of accelerating technological progress" and "In the years since the recession \(\ldots\) the economy has been growing very slowly." The writer concluded, "Both statements can't be completely correct." Do you agree with the writer's conclusion? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, both statements can be considered correct simultaneously. While technology might be growing at a significant pace, it may not immediately or necessarily result in fast economic growth due to various factors such as job displacement, delay in impact or other economic conditions.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Terminologies

Economic growth is generally measured by increases in a country’s GDP (Gross Domestic Product), which reflects the total value of goods and services a country produces. Technological progress refers to the discovery of new or improved methods of producing goods and services.
02

Relationship Between Technological Progress and Economic Growth

Technological progress can lead to economic growth by creating efficiencies in production processes, increasing output per unit of input, creating new industries, and making existing goods and services cheaper. However, it is also possible for an economy to experience technological progress but slow economic growth.
03

Why Technological Progress and Slow Economic Growth Can Co-Exist

Although technological progress can increase production efficiency, other factors may impede economic growth. One reason could be that these new technologies displace existing jobs, leading to higher unemployment and thus lower GDP. Another would be that the benefits of technological advancements are not immediately apparent or felt in the economy. There might be a delay between the implementation of such advances and the visible impact on gross domestic product. In conclusion, it is indeed possible for the economy to experience technological progress and slow economic growth at the same time. Therefore, the two statements given do not necessarily contradict each other.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 742) In his book The White Man's Burden, William Easterly reported: A vaccination campaign in southern Africa virtually eliminated measles as a killer of children. Routine childhood immunization combined with measles vaccination in seven southern African nations starting in 1996 virtually eliminated measles in those countries by \(2000 . \mathrm{A}\) national campaign in Egypt to make parents aware of the use of oral rehydration therapy from 1982 to 1989 cut childhood deaths from diarrhea by 82 percent over that period. a. Is it likely that real GDP per capita increased significantly in southern Africa and Egypt as a result of the near elimination of measles and the large decrease in childhood deaths from diarrhea? If these events did not increase real GDP per capita, is it still possible that they increased the standard of living in southern Africa and Egypt? Briefly explain. b. Which seems more achievable for a developing country: the elimination of measles and childhood deaths from diarrhea or sustained increases in real GDP per capita? Briefly explain.

In 2017 , in a speech in China, Apple CEO Tim Cook stated that globalization is "great for the world \(\ldots .\) I think the reality is you can see that countries in the world \(\ldots\) that isolate themselves, it's not good for their people." a. Why would countries that isolate themselves rather than participate fully in the global economy be hurting their own people? b. Is there an argument to be made that globalization hurts rather than helps some economies? Briefly explain.

What are the main reasons many poor countries have experienced slow growth?

Some economists argue that the apparent slowdown in productivity growth in the United States in recent years is a measurement problem resulting from the failure of GDP to capture the effects of many recent innovations, such as cloud computing. James Manyika, head of technology at McKinsey \& Company, has argued that for many of these innovations, "we have all these benefits but we're not paying for them." a. Before the arrival of the Internet, people looking for facts, such as the population of France or the salary of the president of the United States, had to go to the library to look them up. Now people can find that information in a few seconds with a Google search. Are the benefits to you of being able to do a Google search included in GDP? Briefly explain. b. Does your answer to part (a) indicate that the slowdown in U.S. productivity growth in recent years is just a measurement problem? What other information would you need to arrive at a definite answer?

Briefly explain whether any of the following policies are likely to increase the rate of economic growth in the United States. a. Congress passes an investment tax credit, which reduces a firm's taxes if it installs new machinery and equipment. b. Congress passes a law that allows taxpayers to reduce their income taxes by the amount of state sales taxes they pay. c. Congress provides more funds for low-interest loans to college students.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free