(Related to the Chapter Opener on page 776) An article in the Wall Street Journal on changes in Intel's sales noted, "Intel sells its chips to customers in U.S. dollars, but many \(\mathrm{PC}\) makers that buy those chips sell their products in local currencies." In these circumstances, would an increase in the value of the dollar relative to foreign currencies be likely to help or hurt Intel's sales? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In general, an increase in the value of the US dollar relative to foreign currencies would likely hurt Intel's sales as it would make Intel's chips more expensive for foreign PC makers. However, the actual impact would also depend on other factors such as the price elasticity of demand for Intel's chips and inflation rates in these foreign markets.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the situation

Firstly, understand that when the value of the US dollar increases relative to other currencies, it means that the US dollar is strengthening. When this happens, US goods become more expensive for foreign buyers who must convert their local currency to dollars to make purchases.
02

Analyze the effect on Intel's sales

Given that Intel sells its chips in US dollars, an increase in the value of the US dollar means that these chips become more expensive for foreign PC makers who have to convert their local currency to dollars. Assuming all other factors remain the same, this could lead to a decrease in demand for Intel's chips in foreign markets as these chips become more expensive.
03

Consider other potential factors

Although the increase in the value of the US dollar may make Intel's chips more expensive in foreign markets, other factors could potentially offset this. For example, if the demand for Intel's chips in these markets is inelastic, meaning that buyers are not sensitive to price changes, then the increase in price may not significantly affect sales. Similarly, if there is inflation in these foreign markets, the real cost of Intel's chips may not increase despite the increase in the dollar value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Draw the consumption function and label each axis. Show the effect of an increase in income on consumption spending. Does the change in income cause a movement along the consumption function or a shift of the consumption function? How would an increase in expected future income or an increase in household wealth affect the consumption function? Would these increases cause a movement along the consumption function or a shift of the consumption function? Briefly explain.

A study by the management consulting company McKinsey \& Company recommended that the federal government increase spending on infrastructure, such as bridges and highways, by between \(\$ 150\) and \(\$ 180\) billion per year. The study estimated that the result would be an increase in GDP of between \(\$ 270\) billion and \(\$ 320\) billion per year. What is the implied value of the multiplier if the McKinsey study's estimate of the effect of infrastructure spending on GDP is correct?

A column in the New York Times in 2017 noted that Tesla was expanding both its California automobile factory, where it was beginning to produce its Model 3 electric cars, and its Nevada “Gigafactory," where it was producing lithium- ion batteries for cars and other uses. The article quoted an investment analyst as saying, "I don't know what kind of multiplier you put on that, but it's a significant boost to the economy." a. What does the analyst mean by a multiplier? b. Why would Tesla's engaging in this investment spending result in a significant boost to the economy? c. Why might the analyst have been unsure of the size of the multiplier in this case?

An article in the Wall Street Journal stated, "Europe is entering its fifth consecutive year of growth, supported by accommodative monetary policies, robust business and consumer confidence and improving world trade." What components of aggregate expenditure would "robust business and consumer confidence and improving world trade” affect, and why would they cause real GDP to grow? Illustrate your answer with a \(45^{\circ}\) -line diagram.

What are the five main determinants of consumption spending? Which of these is the most important? How would a rise in stock prices or housing prices affect consumption spending?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free