A column in the New York Times in 2017 noted that Tesla was expanding both its California automobile factory, where it was beginning to produce its Model 3 electric cars, and its Nevada “Gigafactory," where it was producing lithium- ion batteries for cars and other uses. The article quoted an investment analyst as saying, "I don't know what kind of multiplier you put on that, but it's a significant boost to the economy." a. What does the analyst mean by a multiplier? b. Why would Tesla's engaging in this investment spending result in a significant boost to the economy? c. Why might the analyst have been unsure of the size of the multiplier in this case?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The analyst refers to the multiplier effect in economics, illustrating how Tesla's investments could lead to significantly more economic activity beyond the initial investment. The potential economic boost comes from direct and indirect job creation, increased household spending, and more tax revenue. However, the size of the multiplier is hard to ascertain due to many unpredictable factors and variables within the economy.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Concept of Multiplier

The word 'multiplier' in economic context refers to how an initial amount of spending can lead to an increase in national income that is greater than the initial amount of spending. It basically describes how a company's investment can cause an increase in economic activity, beyond just the value of the initial investment. In this case, the value of Tesla's investment in factories and other infrastructures is expected to circulate through the local and greater economy, leading to an overall increase in economic activity. The multiplier effect results from the interconnectedness of an economy's sectors.
02

Investment Impact to Economy

Tesla's investment can stimulate economic growth in several ways. Firstly, it could lead to direct job creation in the factories. Secondly, it will stimulate indirect job creation in the industries that support these factories, such as maintenance, shipping, and serving the employees (like food services, childcare etc.). This increase in employment will lead to increased household spending, which further increases demand for goods and services, stimulating more economic activity. In addition, more taxes will be collected which the government can use to improve public services or infrastructure. It's a cyclical process and thus Tesla's investment creates multiple waves of effect, hence 'multiplier'.
03

Uncertainty of Multiplier Size

The size of the multiplier can be difficult to determine because it depends on a variety of factors which can be hard to predict. How much extra spending will the new employees make? How much will other industries benefit and expand as a result of Tesla's investment? How much of the increased earnings will be saved instead of spent? Will the government use the additional tax revenue for further investment in the economy or address budget deficits? All these uncertainties can make determining the exact multiplier challenging. Also, the multiplier can vary depending on the current state of the economy, predicting that accurately can be complex.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following does the aggregate expenditure model seek to explain: long-run economic growth, the business cycle, inflation, or cyclical unemployment?

Draw the consumption function and label each axis. Show the effect of an increase in income on consumption spending. Does the change in income cause a movement along the consumption function or a shift of the consumption function? How would an increase in expected future income or an increase in household wealth affect the consumption function? Would these increases cause a movement along the consumption function or a shift of the consumption function? Briefly explain.

Use a \(45^{\circ}\) -line diagram to illustrate macroeconomic equilibrium. Make sure your diagram shows the aggregate expenditure function and the level of equilibrium real GDP and that your axes are properly labeled.

An article in the Wall Street Journal stated that at the beginning of May \(2017,\) inventories of pickup trucks were "touching 97 days' supply as of the beginning of May, or a \(12 \%\) increase in actual vehicles on dealer lots compared with the prior year.... That number is far above the industry norm for inventory." Why might U.S. automakers find that their inventories of pickup trucks are unexpectedly rising? How are these automakers likely to react to the increase in inventories?

Suppose we drop the assumption that net exports do not depend on real GDP. Draw a graph with the value of net exports on the vertical axis and the value of real GDP on the horizontal axis. Now, add a line representing the relationship between net exports and real GDP. Does your net exports line have a positive or negative slope? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free