Why can a \(\$ 1\) increase in government purchases lead to more than a \(\$ 1\) increase in income and spending?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A \(\$1\) increase in government purchases can lead to more than a \(\$1\) increase in income and spending due to the multiplier effect. It begins with the government injecting money into the economy, creating demand, and subsequently employment and income. As households earn more, they spend more, creating even more demand, leading to a cycle where the original injection of spending is multiplied.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Fiscal Policy

Fiscal policy is the use of government revenue collection (mostly taxes) and expenditure (spending) to influence a country's economy. It includes the management of inflation, unemployment, and economic growth.
02

The Concept of Government Spending

In fiscal policy, government spending is considered an important aspect. This includes money spent on infrastructure, public services, and others. Such spending is a way of injecting money into the economy.
03

Introducing the Multiplier Effect

The multiplier effect is a principle that states that a change in income can lead to an even larger change in spending. This happens due to the income received being spent by the recipient, creating income for others, and a cycle continues.
04

Applying the Multiplier Effect to Government Spending

When the government increases its purchases by \(\$1\), it initially increases the total demand in the economy, leading to an increase in production. This increased production requires more labor, leading to more employment, which subsequently leads to an increase in household income. These households then spend more, increasing the demand for goods and services. This, in turn, leads to even more production, requiring more labor, and the cycle continues. This is why a \(\$1\) increase in government spending can lead to more than a \(\$1\) increase in income and spending.
05

Conclusion

The reason why a \(\$1\) increase in government purchases can lead to more than a \(\$1\) increase in income and spending is due to the multiplier effect. Understandably, this process will not go on indefinitely. Other factors such as the withdrawal of spending through saving, taxation, and imports will limit this multiplier effect.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Briefly explain whether each of the following is (1) an example of a discretionary fiscal policy, (2) an example of an automatic stabilizer, or (3) not an example of fiscal policy. a. The federal government increases spending on rebuilding the New Jersey Shore following a hurricane. b. The Federal Reserve sells Treasury securities. c. The total amount the federal government spends on unemployment insurance decreases during an expansion. d. The revenue the federal government collects from the individual income tax declines during a recession. e. The federal government changes the fuel efficiency requirements for new cars. f. Congress and the president enact a temporary cut in payroll taxes. g. During a recession, California voters approve additional spending on a statewide high-speed rail system.

Use a dynamic aggregate demand and aggregate supply graph to illustrate the change in macroeconomic equilibrium from 2021 to 2022 , assuming that the economy experiences deflation during 2022. In order for deflation to take place in 2022 , does the economy also have to be experiencing a recession? Briefly explain.

Write the equation that links real GDP growth to its two determinants. Briefly explain why the relationship indicated by the equation holds.

In January 2017, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) noted that its "estimate of the deficit for 2017 has decreased since August 2016." The CBO also noted that its "economic forecast ... underlies its budget projections." a. Why would the CBO's forecast of future levels of GDP and employment matter for its forecasts of future federal budget deficits? b. If the federal budget deficit turns out to be smaller than expected, it is likely that economic growth was higher or lower than expected? Briefly explain.

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 969) The following is from a message by President Herbert Hoover to Congress, dated May 5,1932: I need not recount that the revenues of the Government as estimated for the next fiscal year show a decrease of about \(\$ 1,700,000,000\) below the fiscal year \(1929,\) and inexorably require a broader basis of taxation and a drastic reduction of expenditures in order to balance the Budget. Nothing is more necessary at this time than balancing the Budget. Do you think President Hoover was correct in saying that, in \(1932,\) nothing was more necessary than balancing the federal government's budget? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free