While many economists and policymakers supported the Fed's decision to maintain the federal funds rate at a nearzero level for over six years, Charles Schwab, the founder and chairman of a discount brokerage firm that bears his name, argued that the economy was harmed by keeping interest rates low for an extended period of time: U.S. households lost billions in interest income during the Fed's near-zero interest rate experiment.... Because they are often reliant on income from savings, seniors were hit the hardest.... Seniors make up \(13 \%\) of the U.S. population and spend about \(\$ 1.2\) trillion annually.... This makes for a potent multiplier effect. a. What type of spending was Schwab expecting would have increased if the Fed had raised interest rates earlier than it did? b. Would higher interest rates have had an effect on other types of spending? Briefly explain. c. Which of the types of spending that you discussed in answering parts (a) and (b) does the Fed appear to believe has the more "potent multiplier effect"? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Schwab was expecting consumer spending by seniors to have increased if the Fed had raised interest rates earlier. b. Yes, higher interest rates would have made borrowing more expensive, potentially slowing spending on items that rely on borrowed money. c. The Fed appears to believe that consumer spending across all groups, stimulated by low interest rates that encourage borrowing and investment, has a more 'potent multiplier effect'.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Schwab's perspective

Charles Schwab suggests that low interest rates negatively impact savers, especially seniors, who depend on the income from their savings. Thus, if interest rates were higher, seniors would have more income which they could potentially spend, boosting consumption.
02

Effect of higher interest rates on other types of spending

Higher interest rates make borrowing more expensive, which can discourage spending that relies on borrowed money such as mortgages or business loans. This could potentially slow down spending in these areas.
03

The Fed's perspective on the 'potent multiplier effect'

Looking at the overall macroeconomic perspective, the Fed likely believes that keeping interest rates low encourages more borrowing and investment which stimulates business growth, employment and eventually consumer spending. This creates a powerful multiplier effect in the economy, more so than boosting the income of a particular group (the seniors in this case).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An article in the Economist observed that "a sudden unanticipated spurt of inflation could lead to rapid economic growth." a. Briefly explain the reasoning behind this statement. b. Does it matter whether a spurt of inflation is unanticipated? Might different economists provide different answers to this question? Briefly explain.

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 1000 ) Robert Shiller asked a sample of the general public and a sample of economists the following question: "Do you agree that preventing high inflation is an important national priority, as important as preventing drug abuse or preventing deterioration in the quality of our schools?" Fifty-two percent of the general public, but only 18 percent of economists, fully agreed. Why does the general public believe inflation is a bigger problem than economists do?

An opinion column in the Wall Street Journal noted, "In a democracy, the tradeoff for a central bank's independence is accountability to the nation's elected leadership." a. Why would a country want to grant its central bank more independence than it grants, say, its department of agriculture or department of education? b. In the United States, how is the Fed held accountable to the nation's elected leadership? Source: David Wessel, "Explaining 'Audit the Fed," Wall Street Journal, February 17, 2015 .

Given that the Phillips curve is derived from the aggregate demand and aggregate supply model, is the Phillips curve analysis necessary? That is, what benefits does the Phillips curve analysis offer compared to the aggregate demand and aggregate supply model?

An article in the Economist stated, "Robert Lucas ... showed how incorporating expectations into macroeconomic models muddled the framework economists prior to the 'rational expectations revolution' thought they saw so clearly." What economic framework did economists change as a result of Lucas's arguments? Do all economists agree with Lucas's main conclusions about whether monetary policy is effective? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free