In discussing the U.S. financial account surplus, a Wall Street Journal
editorial made the following observations:
[Much] of it goes to finance an investment shortfall in the U.S., especially
government borrowing. Yet Americans are making millions of individual
decisions about how much to save, and foreigners are not forcing Washington to
borrow. If government weren't gobbling up that capital, more of it would go
into the private economy.
a. What does the editorial mean by an "investment shortfall in the United
States"? In what sense does a financial account surplus finance that
shortfall?
b. What does the editorial mean by asserting that if the government weren't
"gobbling up that capital," it would go into the private economy?
c. Is there a connection between the federal budget deficit and the financial
account surplus?