The competitive equilibrium rent in the city of Lowell is currently \(\$ 1,000\) per month. The government decides to enact rent control and establish a price ceiling of \(\$ 750\) per month for apartments. Briefly explain whether rent control is likely to make each of the following people better or worse off. a. Someone currently renting an apartment in Lowell b. Someone who will be moving to Lowell next year and who intends to rent an apartment c. A landlord who intends to abide by the rent control law d. A landlord who intends to ignore the law and illegally charge the highest rent possible for his apartments

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, assuming no change in the quality of service, the current tenant might be better off due to reduced rent. The prospective tenant might be worse off, facing increased competition for apartments. The law-abiding landlord is likely to be worse off due to reduced profit while the non-law-abiding landlord's outcome would depend on whether they face legal consequences or not.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing the Impact on the Current Tenant

The current tenant, who is already renting an apartment, experiences a decrease in rent from \$1,000 to \$750. This reduces their expenditure if the quality of the apartment remains the same. However, rent control could potentially lead to lesser maintenance and quality of service from the landlords as they are lowering their revenues. Hence, the current tenant could be better or worse depending on whether the reduced cost outweighs the potential decrease in service quality.
02

Analyzing the Impact on the Prospective Tenant

The prospective tenant, who intends to rent an apartment in the future, faces a lower price for rent. However, due to the decline in price, the demand for apartments would increase while the supply might stay constant or decrease (as landlords might not be willing to rent at the reduced price), potentially making it harder for them to find an apartment. Moreover, if landlords reduce their service quality as a response to reduced revenues, the prospective tenant could also potentially face lower living standards. Thus, the rental control could have negative effects for the prospective tenant.
03

Analyzing the Impact on the Law-Abiding Landlord

Landlords complying with rent control face reduced rents and revenues and might therefore earn less profit than before. Furthermore, with reduced revenue, they might cut back on maintenance and service, potentially hurting their reputation or reducing the demand for their apartments. They are likely to be worse off with rent control.
04

Analyzing the Impact on the Non-Law-Abiding Landlord

Landlords who choose to ignore the law might still be able to charge their old rents and maintain their revenues and service levels. However, they run the risk of facing legal consequences if detected. Thus, they might or might not be worse off depending on the chance of getting caught and potential penalties.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As readers of Herman Melville's 1851 novel Moby Dick know, at one time oil made from whale blubber was an important source of energy that was widely used by households and firms in oil lamps. Other sources of energy replaced whale oil in the second half of the nineteenth century, and today many Americans consider whales only as a source of entertainment on visits to aquariums and whale watching excursions. But some species of whales - including baleen and gray whales- are in danger of extinction. The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that more than 9 billion chickens are raised for food annually. Chickens, unlike whales, are not threatened with extinction. Briefly explain why.

Do producers tend to favor price floors or price ceilings? Briefly explain.

What is the tragedy of the commons? How can it be avoided?

University towns with major football programs experience an increase in demand for hotel rooms during home football weekends. Hotels respond to the increase in demand by increasing the prices they charge for rooms. Periodically, there is an outcry against the higher prices, accompanied by accusations of "price gouging." a. Draw a demand and supply graph of the market for hotel rooms in Boostertown for weekends with home football games and another graph for weekends without home football games. If the Boostertown city council passes a law stating that prices for rooms are not allowed to rise, what would happen to the market for hotel rooms during home football game weekends? Show your answer on your graph. b. If the prices of hotel rooms are not allowed to increase, what will be the effect on out-of-town football fans? c. How might the city council's law affect the supply of hotel rooms over time? Briefly explain. d. University towns are not the only places that face peak and nonpeak "seasons." Can you think of other locations that face a large increase in demand for hotel rooms during particular times of the year? Why do we typically not see laws limiting the prices hotels can charge during peak seasons?

Define rivalry and excludability and use these terms to discuss the four categories of goods.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free