William Easterly in The White Man's Burden shared the following account by New York University Professor Leonard Wantchekon of how Professor Wantchekon's village in Benin, Africa, managed the local fishing pond when he was growing up: To open the fishing season, elders performed ritual tests at Amlé, a lake fifteen kilometers from the village. If the fish were large enough, fishing was allowed for two or three days. If they were too small, all fishing was forbidden, and anyone who secretly fished the lake at this time was outcast, excluded from the formal and informal groups that formed the village's social structure. Those who committed this breach of trust were often shunned by the whole community; no one would speak to the offender, or even acknowledge his existence for a year or more. What economic problem were the village elders trying to prevent? Do you think their solution was effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The village elders were trying to prevent overfishing which would deplete their resource, and potentially destabilize the village's livelihood. Their solution, which combined sustainable resource use and a social enforcement mechanism, was effectively addressing this issue, preventing resource exhaustion, and securing the village's long-term survival.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Economical Problem

The foremost concern was resource maintenance, in this case, the fishing pond. The elders regulated the fishing season based on the fish size, and if too small, fishing was completely prohibited. The problem they aimed to address was overfishing, leading to depletion of the fish population and therefore the village's resource.
02

Analyzing the Village Elders' Solution

Their strategy centered around sustainable use of the resource. They checked the readiness of the resource (in this case, the fish size) before opening the fishing season. If not up to standard, fishing was banned to allow for replenishment. Additionally, they implemented a social punishment system to impose the consensus, wherein violators were shunned; this was a deterrence method to discourage overfishing.
03

Evaluating Effectiveness

Their solution was effective in preventing the economic issue of overfishing and depletion of resources. The social punishment served as a strong deterrent against violation of the community-wide rule. Consequently, this approach ensured sustainability by protecting the fishing pond from being overused and allowing time for the fish population to regenerate. Thus, preserving the pond for future generations and keeping the livelihood of the villagers intact.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A columnist for the Wall Street Journal argued that highspeed Internet connections are now a public good: "We're going to have to transition to the building of public infrastructure and away from the revolution being the domain of private enterprise. It's not enough for Google to roll out high- speed fiber to a handful of cities." a. In what ways is the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections like automobile highways? In what ways is it different from highways? b. As of 2017 , private firms have constructed most of the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections,while governments have constructed most highways. Is it still possible that the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections is a public good despite this fact? Briefly explain. c. Do you agree with the columnist that we should think of the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections as being like a public good? Is there any information you would need to know before deciding?

What is a black market? Under what circumstances do black markets arise?

In writing about the increased popularity of national parks in the United States, such as Yosemite, Yellowstone, and the Grand Canyon, environmental economist Margaret Walls wrote: When one person's visit to a park doesn't appreciably diminish the experience for others, the fee to use the park should be zero. That doesn't apply when the public good starts to experience congestion problems \(\ldots\) the Park Service should.... [charge] a significantly higher fee at the most popular parks during the summer months. Are Yosemite and other national parks public goods? Briefly explain.

Why do some consumers tend to favor price controls while others tend to oppose them?

As readers of Herman Melville's 1851 novel Moby Dick know, at one time oil made from whale blubber was an important source of energy that was widely used by households and firms in oil lamps. Other sources of energy replaced whale oil in the second half of the nineteenth century, and today many Americans consider whales only as a source of entertainment on visits to aquariums and whale watching excursions. But some species of whales - including baleen and gray whales- are in danger of extinction. The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that more than 9 billion chickens are raised for food annually. Chickens, unlike whales, are not threatened with extinction. Briefly explain why.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free