What is market failure? When is market failure likely to arise?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Market failure is an economic term that refers to a situation where the quantity of a product demanded by consumers does not equate to the quantity supplied by suppliers. It occurs due to factors like externalities, market power, public goods, and incomplete information. It's likely to arise when these factors are present or in situations like the 'Tragedy of the Commons'.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Market Failure

Market failure is an economic term that encompasses situations where, in any given market, the quantity of a product demanded by consumers does not equate to the quantity supplied by suppliers. This can lead to inefficiency in the allocation of goods and services.
02

Causes of Market Failure

Market failure can occur due to various possible factors:\n\n1. Externalities: These are the indirect costs or benefits, not accounted for in the final price of goods or services. For example, a factory producing goods might pollute the environment, which isn't a cost borne by consumers or the factory, but a cost to society. This is a negative externality.\n\n2. Market Power: In an ideal market, no single party has the ability to set prices, they are determined by supply and demand. But when a party has monopoly power, they can set prices to their advantage, leading to market failure.\n\n3. Public Goods: These are non-excludable and non-rival goods, meaning they are available for everyone, and one's usage doesn't reduce availability for others. Examples include clean air, street lights etc. As these can't be priced easily, they lead to market failure.\n\n4. Incomplete Information: If buyers and sellers don't have all the information to make rational decisions, this can lead to market failure.
03

When Market Failure is likely to arise

Market failure is likely to arise when the above-mentioned conditions occur. It commonly occurs in a situation known as the 'Tragedy of the Commons'. When a resource is available to all, and each individual has an incentive to deplete it, the resource can eventually become scarce, leading to market failure. It also occurs in the case of public goods, when markets often fail to provide them at all, or in sufficient quantity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In recent years, companies have used fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, in drilling for oil and natural gas that previously could not be profitably recovered. According to an article in the New York Times, "horizontal drilling has enabled engineers to inject millions of gallons of high-pressure water directly into layers of shale to create the fractures that release the gas. Chemicals added to the water dissolve minerals, kill bacteria that might plug up the well, and insert sand to prop open the fractures." Experts are divided about whether fracking results in significant pollution, but some people worry that chemicals used in fracking might lead to pollution of underground supplies of water used by households and farms. a. First, assume that fracking causes no significant pollution. Use a demand and supply graph to show the effect of fracking on the market for natural gas. b. Now assume that fracking does result in pollution. On your graph from part (a), show the effect of fracking. Be sure to carefully label all curves and all equilibrium points. c. In your graph in part (b), what has happened to the efficient level of output and the efficient price in the market for natural gas compared with the situation before fracking? Can you be certain that the efficient level of output and the efficient price have risen or fallen as a result of fracking? Briefly explain.

What is the Coase theorem? Why do the parties involved in an externality have an incentive to reach an efficient solution?

A column in the New York Times has the headline "Should We Tax People for Being Annoying?" a. Do annoying people cause a negative externality? Should they be taxed? Do crying babies on a bus or plane cause a negative externality? Should the babies (or their parents) be taxed? b. Do people who plant flowers and otherwise have beautiful gardens visible from the street cause a positive externality? Should these people receive a government subsidy? c. Should every negative externality be taxed? Should every positive externality be subsidized? How might the government decide whether using Pigovian taxes and subsidies is appropriate?

William Easterly in The White Man's Burden shared the following account by New York University Professor Leonard Wantchekon of how Professor Wantchekon's village in Benin, Africa, managed the local fishing pond when he was growing up: To open the fishing season, elders performed ritual tests at Amlé, a lake fifteen kilometers from the village. If the fish were large enough, fishing was allowed for two or three days. If they were too small, all fishing was forbidden, and anyone who secretly fished the lake at this time was outcast, excluded from the formal and informal groups that formed the village's social structure. Those who committed this breach of trust were often shunned by the whole community; no one would speak to the offender, or even acknowledge his existence for a year or more. What economic problem were the village elders trying to prevent? Do you think their solution was effective?

In 2017, President Donald Trump was considering a major increase on federal government spending on infrastructure, including building and repairing bridges, highways, rail lines, and subways. An article in the Economist argued, "Just as economists talk of 'negative externalities' (from, say, pollution), infrastructure can have positive externalities that are not captured by investors but will benefit society." a. Explain what positive externalities infrastructure spending might generate. b. If infrastructure spending generates a positive externality, what effect should this have on government policy?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free