Why is a bond considered to be a loan but a share of stock is not? Why do corporations issue both bonds and shares of stock?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Bonds are considered loans because they require the issuer (borrower) to pay back the holder (lender) the principal amount plus interest. Shares of stock are not loans because they represent part ownership in a company with potential returns coming from dividends and appreciation of stock value, but no obligation for the company to pay back the invested amount. Corporations issue both bonds and shares of stocks as they serve differing financial needs: bonds for debt financing, meaning borrowing money, and stocks for equity financing, meaning selling part of the company ownership.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Bonds

A bond is a financial instrument representing a loan made by an investor to a borrower. Corporations, municipalities, and governments commonly use bonds to finance projects and operations. The issuer of the bond is the borrower, and the holder of the bond (or the investor) is the lender. Once a bond is bought, the holder is assured of regular interest payments from the issuer at a predetermined rate (the coupon rate) and the repayment of the principal at bond's maturity date.
02

Understanding Stocks

A share of stock, on the other hand, represents a share in the ownership of a company. It signifies a claim on part of the company's assets and earnings. Unlike bond holders, shareholders do not lend money to the company and are not entitled to interest payments. However, they can potentially benefit from dividends, which are a portion of the company’s profits distributed to shareholders, and capital gains if the value of the stock appreciates.
03

Corporations Issuing Bonds and Stocks

Corporations issue both bonds and shares of stocks because each serves a different purpose. Bonds are debt financing instrument which allow companies to borrow large amounts of capital from investors, to be paid back with interest, which can be helpful during expansion or for projects that require large upfront investment. Stocks are equity financing instruments and by issuing stocks a company essentially sells a portion of its ownership or equity in exchange for capital. In this case, the company does not need to pay back the money raised but also relinquishes a portion of control and profits to the shareholders.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Bonds vs Stocks
When corporations seek to raise funds, they have two primary options: issuing bonds or stocks. But what exactly differentiates these two financial instruments?

Bonds, as described in the exercise, are forms of debt. When investors buy bonds, they're effectively lending money to the entity issuing the bonds in exchange for periodic interest payments and the return of the bond's face value at maturity. Bonds are thus a safer investment since they promise to repay the principal plus interest, thereby being considered loans.

Stocks represent equity in a company. Purchasing stock makes the investor one of the company's owners, albeit usually in a very small percentage. Stocks don't guarantee any payments; however, they have the potential for dividends and value appreciation. Unlike bondholders, stockholders have residual claims on a company's assets and may have voting rights that can influence company decisions. Stocks are not considered loans because they represent ownership stakes, rather than a debt obligation.
Corporate Finance
The realm of corporate finance pertains to the financial decisions businesses make and the tools and analysis utilized to make these decisions. It is essential for corporations to manage their finances efficiently to ensure they can fund operations, maximize profits, and plan for long-term growth. The choice between debt and equity financing is a crucial decision within corporate finance. Acquiring funds through issuing bonds (debt financing) maintains control of the company with the existing owners but comes with an obligation to pay back the borrowed sum along with interest. Alternatively, acquiring funds through selling stock (equity financing) may dilute ownership but doesn't obligate the company to repay the investors. Corporate finance teams must weigh these options carefully to sustain the company’s financial health.
Equity Financing
In the context of equity financing, a company raises capital by selling shares of its stock, essentially exchanging ownership interests for funds.

The attractiveness of equity financing lies in its no-obligation feature concerning repayment. Companies don't need to repay the capital or make regular interest payments, which can be beneficial if the company is not generating enough cash flow. However, this type of financing comes with the downside of ownership dilution. The more shares a company issues, the smaller the fraction of ownership each shareholder owns, which can also lead to reduced control over the company for the original owners. Stockholders become vested in the company's success, sharing both the potential upsides and the risks.
Debt Financing
Conversely, debt financing occurs when a company raises funds by selling bonds or taking out loans, promising to pay back the borrowed money over time with interest. This option allows companies to raise capital without giving up ownership stakes.

The advantages include tax benefits, as interest payments on debt are often tax-deductible, and retaining control, since bondholders are creditors and not owners, therefore, they don't have voting rights. The risks associated with debt financing include the mandatory payment obligations, which can strain cash flow, especially if a company's income is not stable or predictable. Additionally, too much debt can make a company less attractive to investors and potentially lead to financial distress or bankruptcy if it becomes unable to meet its debt obligations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 264) A column in the Wall Street Journal listed "trying to forecast what stocks will do next" as one of the three mistakes investors make repeatedly. Briefly explain why trying to forecast stock prices would be a mistake for the average investor.

Evaluate the following argument: I would like to invest in the stock market, but I think that buying shares of stock in a corporation is too risky. Suppose I buy \(\$ 10,000\) of Twitter stock, and the company ends up going bankrupt. Because as a stockholder I'm part owner of the company, I might be responsible for paying hundreds of thousands of dollars of the company's debts.

Distinguish between a firm's explicit costs and its implicit costs and between a firm's accounting profit and its economic profit.

Paolo currently has \(\$ 100,000\) invested in bonds that earn him 4 percent interest per year. He wants to open a pizza restaurant and is considering either selling the bonds and using the \(\$ 100,000\) to start his restaurant or borrowing \(\$ 100,000\) from a bank, which would charge him an annual interest rate of 6 percent. He finally decides to sell the bonds and not take out the bank loan. He reasons: "Because I already have the \(\$ 100,000\) invested in the bonds, I don't have to pay anything to use the money. If I take out the bank loan, I have to pay interest, so my costs of producing pizza will be higher if I take out the loan than if I sell the bonds." Evaluate Paolo's reasoning.

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 256) While running for president, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton published a position paper outlining how, if elected, she would make it easier to start a small business. One of her proposals was: Any state and locality willing to make starting a business cheaper and easier and meaningfully streamline unnecessary licensing programs will receive federal funding to support innovative programs and offset forgone licensing revenue. a. Why might this proposal be expected to increase the rate at which small businesses are formed? b. Given your answer to part (a), why did state and local governments pass such licensing requirements in the first place?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free