Briefly explain whether you agree with the following statement: "International trade is more important to the U.S. economy than it is to most other economies."

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the analysis of international trade, the U.S. economy and the comparison to other economies, it can be argued that whether the statement is true or not depends on specific measures of 'importance'. For instance, if we were to measure importance in terms of total volume of trade, the U.S., being one of the world's largest economies, may indeed regard international trade as more 'important'. However, if we were to measure importance in terms of a nation's reliance on trade for its economic output, smaller countries might see trade as more 'important' to their economies. Therefore, without a specific measure of 'importance', it can be difficult to definitively agree or disagree with the statement.

Step by step solution

01

Understand international trade

International trade involves the exchange of goods and services across international borders or territories. It allows countries to expand their markets for goods and services that may not be available domestically.
02

Understand the U.S. economy

The U.S. economy, being one of the largest and most technologically advanced in the world, heavily participates in international trade. The U.S. imports goods and services that are cheaper or not available domestically, and exports goods and services it has strengths in, which helps to boost domestic industry.
03

Compare to other economies

While all economies participate in international trade, the relative importance varies. Other economies, especially those of smaller or less developed countries, may rely more heavily on trades with larger partners like the U.S.. Additionally, economies of some countries may rely more on domestic transactions rather than international trade.
04

Formulate a conclusion

Given the understanding of international trade, the U.S. economy, and the comparison to other economies, one can carefully analyze and agree or disagree, with well formulated arguments, with the statement that 'International trade is more important to the U.S. economy than it is to most other economies.'

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An article in the Wall Street Journal discussing the effect of Chinese imports on the U.S. economy made the following observation: "[China's] emergence as a trade powerhouse rattled the American economy more violently than economists and policy makers anticipated at the time.... The U.S. workforce adapted more slowly than expected." a. What does the article mean that China's emergence as a trade powerhouse rattled the U.S. economy? b. Why didn't economists and policymakers expect the economic effect of imports from China to be as great as it turned out to be? c. In what sense has the U.S. workforce adapted more slowly than expected?

Why might a smaller country, such as the Netherlands, be more likely to import and export larger fractions of its GDP than would a larger country, such as China or the United States?

An article in the New York Times discussed the number of innovative food companies, particularly those selling natural foods, that have become established in Boulder, Colorado, in recent years. According to the article, Boulder has a large number of people with experience in managing food companies, lenders who know the industry, food distributors, and food processing plants. The article quoted one entrepreneur as asserting: "There's an ecosystem here that supports food entrepreneurs that you just don't find in other places. Everything you need, including a lot of experience and expertise, is right here." What advantages does being located in Boulder give to startup natural food firms? In what circumstances can natural food firms located elsewhere overcome these advantages? Are Boulder's advantages likely to persist over time?

An article in the New Yorker stated, "The main burden of trade-related job losses and wage declines has fallen on middle- and lower-income Americans. But ... the very people who suffer most from free trade are often, paradoxically, among its biggest beneficiaries." Explain how it is possible that middle-and lower-income Americans are both the biggest losers and at the same time the biggest winners from free trade.

What are the main sources of comparative advantage?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free