Chapter 9: Problem 2
What is meant by a country specializing in the production of a good? Is it typical for countries to be completely specialized? Briefly explain.
Chapter 9: Problem 2
What is meant by a country specializing in the production of a good? Is it typical for countries to be completely specialized? Briefly explain.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeAn article in the New Yorker stated, "The main burden of trade-related job losses and wage declines has fallen on middle- and lower-income Americans. But ... the very people who suffer most from free trade are often, paradoxically, among its biggest beneficiaries." Explain how it is possible that middle-and lower-income Americans are both the biggest losers and at the same time the biggest winners from free trade.
A political commentator makes the following statement: The idea that international trade should be based on the comparative advantage of each country is fine for rich countries like the United States and Japan. Rich countries have educated workers and large quantities of machinery and equipment. These advantages allow them to produce every product more efficiently than poor countries can. Poor countries like Kenya and Uruguay have nothing to gain from international trade based on comparative advantage. Do you agree with this argument? Briefly explain.
At one time, Eastman Kodak was the world's largest producer of photographic film, employing nearly 145,000 workers worldwide, including thousands at its headquarters in Rochester, New York. The firm eventually laid off most of those workers because its sales declined as it failed to adjust to digital photography as quickly as many of its foreign competitors. A member of Congress from Rochester described the many new firms that were now located in buildings that were formerly owned by Kodak. A New York Times columnist concluded, "which, of course, is precisely the way globalization is supposed to work." Briefly explain what the columnist meant. Do you agree with his conclusion?
A student makes the following argument: Tariffs on imports of foreign goods into the United States will cause the foreign companies to add the amount of the tariff to the prices they charge in the United States for those goods. Instead of putting a tariff on imported goods, we should ban importing them. Banning imported goods is better than putting tariffs on them because U.S. producers benefit from the reduced competition, and U.S. consumers don't have to pay the higher prices caused by tariffs. Briefly explain whether you agree with the student's reasoning.
Patrick J. Buchanan, a political commentator and former presidential candidate, argued in his book on the global economy that there is a flaw in David Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage: Classical free trade theory fails the test of common sense. According to Ricardo's law of comparative advantage \(\ldots\) if America makes better computers and textiles than China does, but our advantage in computers is greater than our advantage in textiles, we should (1) focus on computers, (2) let China make textiles, and (3) trade U.S. computers for Chinese textiles.... The doctrine begs a question. If Americans are more efficient than Chinese in making clothes \(\ldots\) why surrender the more efficient American industry? Why shift to a reliance on a Chinese textile industry that will take years to catch up to where American factories are today? Do you agree with Buchanan's argument? Briefly explain.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.