If the United States were to stop trading goods and services with other countries, which U.S. industries would be likely to see their sales decline the most? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The U.S. industries most likely to see their sales decline if the United States ceased trading with other countries include the agriculture, aerospace, automotive, machinery, and technology sectors. These industries heavily rely on foreign markets, making them vulnerable to sales declines without international trade activity.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying Major US Export Industries

Before determining the industries likely to see the most sales decline, identify the top goods and services the United States exports. Major categories include industrial supplies, capital goods, consumer goods, agricultural products, automotive vehicles, and parts and services like tourism and software.
02

Assessing Dependency on Export

Next, assess the dependence of these industries on export sales. The greater the proportion of an industry’s output that is exported, the greater the potential for sales to decline if international trade concludes. For instance, aerospace, agriculture, automotive, machinery, and technology industries heavily depend on exports.
03

Impact Analysis

Finally, consider the specific impact on each industry. For example, the agricultural industry might take a substantial hit because foreign nations are critical buyers of U.S. agricultural products. Industrial and technological goods, such as aircraft, vehicles, and electronic components, could also be significantly affected since they constitute a large chunk of U.S. exports.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

International Trade and Economics
International trade plays a foundational role in modern economics, involving the exchange of goods and services between countries. This exchange is driven by the principle of comparative advantage, where nations produce and export goods in which they have a lower opportunity cost, and import goods where other countries have this advantage.

For the U.S., international trade allows industries to expand their markets beyond domestic borders, leading to increased sales and economic growth. The mix of exported goods and services from the U.S. is diverse, ranging from agricultural products to high-tech machinery, reflecting the country's varied economic landscape. Trade agreements, tariffs, exchange rates, and global economic conditions are several factors influencing international trade dynamics and the economic health of U.S. export industries.
Dependency on Exports
The dependency on exports refers to the extent to which industries and economies rely on selling goods and services to international buyers. Industries with a high export dependency can experience substantial economic impacts from changes in global trade policies or demand.

For instance, the U.S. aerospace industry, with companies like Boeing, exports a significant portion of its production. Similarly, the U.S. agricultural sector relies heavily on the export market for a large volume of its harvest, selling commodities such as soybeans, corn, and wheat globally. Understanding the degree of export dependence is crucial for industries as it shapes their vulnerability to external economic shocks and informs strategies for risk mitigation and market diversification.
Industry Impact Analysis
Industry impact analysis assesses the potential effects of economic changes on different sectors. It considers factors such as job creation, income levels, and the balance of trade. When analyzing the impact of halting international trade on U.S. industries, we look at both the direct effects on sales and production and the ripple effects throughout the economy.

As specified in the exercise solution, industries like aerospace would see a decline in sales due to their reliance on foreign markets. Others, such as electronics, that supply global supply chains with critical components would also suffer. Furthermore, industries with high export-dependency tend to contribute significantly to employment and technology advancements, meaning their decline could have wide-reaching implications on innovation, job security, and overall economic stability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 312 ) In \(2016,\) an editorial in the Wall Street Journal was in favor of, "repealing the notorious catfish program that has become a byword for Washington waste and protectionism? This should be an easy call." Why would a federal government program to inspect catfish be considered an example of protectionism? If repealing the program is "an easy call," as the editorial asserts, why was the program still in place in \(2017,\) more than a year after the editorial was published?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 307) An economic analysis of a proposal to impose a quota on steel imports into the United States indicated that the quota would save 3,700 jobs in the steel industry but cost about 35,000 jobs in other U.S. industries. Why would a quota on steel imports cause employment to decline in other industries? Which other industries is a steel quota likely to affect?

Steven Landsburg, an economist at the University of Rochester, wrote the following in an article in the Wall Street Journal: Free trade is not only about the right of American consumers to buy at the cheapest possible price; it's also about the right of foreign producers to earn a living. Steelworkers in West Virginia struggle hard to make ends meet. So do steelworkers in South Korea. To protect one at the expense of the other, solely because of where they happened to be born, is a moral outrage. How does the U.S. government protect steelworkers in West Virginia at the expense of steelworkers in South Korea? Is Landsburg making a positive statement or a normative statement? A few days later, Tom Redburn published an article disagreeing with Landsburg. Redburn argued that caring about the welfare of people in the United States more than about the welfare of people in other countries isn't "some evil character flaw." According to Redburn, "A society that ignores the consequences of economic disruption on those among its citizens who come out at the short end of the stick is not only heartless, it also undermines its own cohesion and adaptability." Which of the two arguments do you find most convincing?

Who gains and who loses when a country imposes a tariff or a quota on imports of a good?

Former President Barack Obama once described a trade agreement reached with the government of Colombia as a "win-win' for both our countries." Is everyone in both countries likely to win from the agreement? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free