In the 2016 Summer Olympic Games, Ashton Eaton (from the United States) won a gold medal in the decathlon, which requires athletes to compete in 10 different track and field events. In one of these events Eaton ran a 100 -meter race in 10.46 seconds. In a separate event, Usain Bolt (from Jamaica) won a gold medal by running 100 meters in 9.81 seconds. a. Which performance-Eaton's or Bolt's-is better explained by the concept of comparative advantage? Briefly explain. b. Based on their performance at the 2016 Olympic Games, can we say whether Eaton or Bolt was the better athlete? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Part a) The concept of comparative advantage better explains Usain Bolt's performance as he ran the 100-meter race more efficiently (faster) than Ashton Eaton. b) We can't definitively say whether Eaton or Bolt was the better athlete based solely on their performance at the 2016 Olympic Games as both athletes excelled in different disciplines.

Step by step solution

01

Comparative Advantage

Comparative advantage is the ability to carry out a particular activity more efficiently than another activity. The performance of Ashton Eaton and Usain Bolt in the 100-meter race can be compared to determine who has a comparative advantage. Since Usain Bolt ran the 100-meter race in 9.81 seconds, compared to Ashton Eaton's 10.46 seconds, Usain Bolt has a comparative advantage in this event as he can run it more efficiently (faster).
02

Overall Athletic Performance

To determine the better athlete, we need to compare not just one, but a range of events. The decathlon encompasses 10 different track and field events and requires versatility and a wide skill set, requiring Ashton Eaton to compete in such diverse events as running, jumping and throwing. This means that Eaton's gold medal in the decathlon demonstrates an overall athletic ability across a variety of disciplines. Meanwhile, Usain Bolt's gold medal showcases incredible speed but over a single discipline. Therefore, we cannot definitively say whether Eaton or Bolt was the better athlete based solely on their performance at the 2016 Olympic Games because they excelled in different areas.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Patrick J. Buchanan, a political commentator and former presidential candidate, argued in his book on the global economy that there is a flaw in David Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage: Classical free trade theory fails the test of common sense. According to Ricardo's law of comparative advantage \(\ldots\) if America makes better computers and textiles than China does, but our advantage in computers is greater than our advantage in textiles, we should (1) focus on computers, (2) let China make textiles, and (3) trade U.S. computers for Chinese textiles.... The doctrine begs a question. If Americans are more efficient than Chinese in making clothes \(\ldots\) why surrender the more efficient American industry? Why shift to a reliance on a Chinese textile industry that will take years to catch up to where American factories are today? Do you agree with Buchanan's argument? Briefly explain.

What is dumping? Who benefits and who loses from dumping? What problems arise when anti-dumping laws are implemented?

What are the main sources of comparative advantage?

(Related to the Chapter Opener on page 288) While running for the 2016 Democratic nomination for president, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders opposed the TransPacific Partnership in part because he believed that as a result of the agreement, "the U.S. will lose more than 130,000 jobs to Vietnam and Japan alone." Do you agree that reducing barriers to trade reduces the number of jobs available to workers in the United States? Briefly explain.

Political commentator B. Bruce-Briggs once wrote the following in the Wall Street Journal: "This is not to say that the case for international free trade is invalid; it is just irrelevant. It is an 'if only everybody' ... argument .... In the real world almost everybody sees benefits in economic nationalism." What do you think he means by "economic nationalism"? Do you agree that a country benefits from free trade only if every other country also practices free trade? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free