A columnist for bloomberg.com offered the following observation about economic legislation: "History shows that concentrated opposition beats diffuse support every time." a. Briefly explain what this columnist means. b. Does his observation apply to tariffs? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The columnist's statement that 'concentrated opposition beats diffuse support every time' refers to the power of a focused and passionate small group versus a larger but indifferent group. When applied to tariffs, domestic producers who benefit from tariffs can be seen as the 'concentrated opposition' who often lobby strongly for these tariffs. Consumers, who face higher prices due to tariffs, can be seen as the 'diffuse support' - harmed by the tariffs but typically less organized in their opposition.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Statement

The first step is about deciphering the meaning of the statement. Here, the term 'concentrated opposition' refers to a small, focused group that is strongly against a particular issue, while 'diffuse support' refers to a large but not particularly passionate or focused group. The columnist is expressing that a small, focused group that is strongly against an issue usually overpowers a larger, but indifferent group.
02

Application to Tariffs

The next step is to apply this understanding to the concept of tariffs. In the case of tariffs, a small group of people - the domestic producers, who benefit from tariffs because they reduce foreign competition, comprises the 'concentrated opposition'. They often lobby strongly for maintaining tariffs. On the other hand, the 'diffuse support' can be associated with consumers, who are harmed by tariffs due to higher prices, but who are typically less organized and passionate about this issue. So, the columnist's observation can be applied to tariffs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Tariffs
When we discuss tariffs, we're talking about the taxes imposed on imported goods. These taxes are usually set by a country to protect its own industries by making foreign products more expensive, hence less appealing, than local ones.

For instance, if a country sets a high tariff on imported cheese, local cheese producers are at an advantage as their cheese would be relatively cheaper than that from overseas. This concept ties into the exercise when considering who benefits from these policies – domestic producers often lobby for tariffs because it helps them compete against foreign imports.

The impact of tariffs can be multifaceted: while protecting local jobs in targeted industries, they can also lead to higher prices for consumers, possibly reducing their purchasing power. Economists often debate this trade-off when discussing the overall utility of tariffs in modern economies.
Concentrated Opposition Versus Diffuse Support
The phrase 'concentrated opposition beats diffuse support' refers to the dynamics of group interests and how they influence policy. 'Concentrated opposition' means a small, energized, and well-organized group that is intensely affected by an issue and will mobilize to oppose or support policy changes. In contrast, 'diffuse support' represents a large group that is mildly affected or less passionate about the issue, thus less likely to mobilize.

For example, a piece of legislation that could close a factory might ignite fierce resistance from the workers and the town that depend on it (concentrated opposition) despite potential benefits for the broader economy or environment (diffuse support). This concept is crucial for understanding how certain economic policies, like tariffs, can be maintained despite having widespread but less organized effects on the general populace.
Lobbying in Economics
Lobbying involves stakeholders attempting to influence decisions made by lawmakers or government officials. In the context of economics, business groups, labor unions, advocacy groups, or individuals engage in lobbying to push for legislative changes that would benefit them financially or strategically.

Lobbyists can provide information, make campaign contributions, or promise political support to persuade lawmakers. Often, industries or sectors like agriculture, pharmaceuticals, or manufacturing that stand to gain or lose significantly from policy changes will have the most vested interest in lobbying efforts.

In the context of the textbook exercise, domestic producers would lobby for tariffs because they limit competition from abroad, benefiting their business. This lobbying shapes economic legislation, potentially leading to tariff policies that persist due to the concentrated efforts of a small but influential group.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose you are explaining the benefits of free trade and someone states, "I don't understand all the principles of comparative advantage and gains from trade. I just know that if I buy something produced in America, I create a job for an American, and if I buy something produced in Brazil, I create a job for a Brazilian." Do you agree with this statement? When the United States imports products for which it does not have a comparative advantage, does this mean there are fewer jobs in the United States? In the example in Section 9.3 with China and the United States producing and trading smartphones and wheat, when the United States imports smartphones from China, does the number of jobs in the United States decline? Briefly explain.

Briefly explain how international trade increases a country's consumption.

The following data summarize the trade between Canada and the United States in 2015 and 2016 . In both years, the value of Canada's exports to the United States exceeded the value of U.S. exports to Canada. Can we conclude that foreign trade between the two countries benefited Canada more than it benefited the United States? Briefly explain.

Briefly explain whether you agree with the following statement: "Japan has always been much more heavily involved in international trade than are most other nations. In fact, today Japan exports a larger fraction of its GDP than Germany, the United Kingdom, or the United States."

An article in the New York Times discussed the number of innovative food companies, particularly those selling natural foods, that have become established in Boulder, Colorado, in recent years. According to the article, Boulder has a large number of people with experience in managing food companies, lenders who know the industry, food distributors, and food processing plants. The article quoted one entrepreneur as asserting: "There's an ecosystem here that supports food entrepreneurs that you just don't find in other places. Everything you need, including a lot of experience and expertise, is right here." What advantages does being located in Boulder give to startup natural food firms? In what circumstances can natural food firms located elsewhere overcome these advantages? Are Boulder's advantages likely to persist over time?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free