Which of the following statements is true? a. A reduction in tax rates along the downwardsloping portion of the Laffer curve would increase tax revenues. b. According to supply-side fiscal policy, lower tax rates would shift the aggregate demand curve to the right, expanding the economy and creating some inflation. c. The presence of automatic stabilizers tends to destabilize the economy. d. To combat inflation, Keynesians recommend lower taxes and greater government spending.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Statement a is true: a reduction in tax rates along the downward-sloping portion of the Laffer curve would increase tax revenues.

Step by step solution

01

: Understand the Laffer curve

: The Laffer curve theorizes that increasing tax rates beyond a certain point might be counterproductive for raising further tax revenue. It is characterized by an inverted U shape, suggesting that at certain high tax rates, reducing tax could actually increase tax revenue. #Step 2: Analyze statement a#
02

: Is statement a true?

: Based on the properties of the Laffer curve, on the downward-sloping part of the curve, a reduction in tax rates would theoretically increase tax revenues. Therefore, statement a is true. #Step 3: Analyze supply-side fiscal policy#
03

: Understand Supply-side fiscal policy

: Supply-side fiscal policies focus on increasing aggregate supply by reducing the barriers for production such as lower tax rates. The lower cost of production should, in theory, shift the aggregate demand curve right due to increased consumption from lower prices. #Step 4: Analyze statement b#
04

: Is statement b true?

: Statement b is incorrect. While lower tax rates would indeed potentially expand the economy due to enhanced production and consumption, it would shift the aggregate supply curve to the right, not the aggregate demand curve. #Step 5: Analyze automatic stabilizers#
05

: Understand automatic stabilizers

: Automatic stabilizer refers to government policies and programs designed to offset fluctuations in a nation's economic activity without the need for intervention by policymakers. #Step 6: Analyze statement c#
06

: Is statement c true?

: Statement c is false. The purpose of automatic stabilizers is to stabilize the economy, not to destabilize it. #Step 7: Analyze Keynesian recommendations#
07

: Understand Keynesian economics

: Contrary to the Keynesian approach, fighting inflation often involves reducing fiscal stimuli like government spending and potentially raising taxes to manage overheating in the economy. #Step 8: Analyze statement d#
08

: Is statement d true?

: Statement d is false. To combat inflation, Keynesians would typically recommend decreased government spending and potentially increased taxes to cool down the economy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If no fiscal policy changes are made, suppose the current aggregate demand curve will increase horizontally by \(\$ 1,000\) billion and cause inflation. If the marginal propensity to consume \((M P C)\) is \(0.80,\) federal policymakers could follow Keynesian economics and restrain inflation by decreasing a. government spending by \(\$ 200\) billion. b. taxes by \(\$ 100\) billion. c. taxes by \(\$ 1,000\) billion. d. government spending by \(\$ 1,000\) billion.

If no fiscal policy changes are implemented, suppose the future aggregate demand curve will shift and exceed the current aggregate demand curve by \(\$ 900\) billion at any level of prices. Assuming the marginal propensity to consume \((M P C)\) is \(0.90,\) this increase in aggregate demand could be prevented by a. increasing government spending by \(\$ 500\) billion. b. increasing government spending by \(\$ 140\) billion. c. decreasing taxes by \(\$ 40\) billion. d. increasing taxes by \(\$ 100\) billion.

Mathematically, the value of the tax multiplier in terms of the marginal propensity to consume \((M P C)\) is given by the formula a. \(M P C-1\) b. \((M P C-1) / M P C\) c. \(1 / M P C\) d. \(1-[1 /(1-M P C)]\)

The sum of the marginal propensity to consume \((M P C)\) and the marginal propensity to save \((M P S)\) always equals a. 1 b. 0 c. the interest rate. d. the marginal propensity to invest \((M P I)\)

If no fiscal policy changes are implemented, suppose the future aggregate demand curve will exceed the current aggregate demand curve by \(\$ 500\) billion at any level of prices. Assuming the marginal propensity to consume \((M P C)\) is 0.80 this increase in aggregate demand could be prevented by a. increasing government spending by \(\$ 500\) billion. b. increasing government spending by \(\$ 140\) billion. c. decreasing taxes by \(\$ 40\) billion. d. increasing taxes by \(\$ 125\) billion.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free