Why might a low-income nation with a currently very high degree of air cleanliness view a higher pollution level created by newly relocated plants of Chinese firms as optimal?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is more economical that emissions to retain obtaining smaller systems or carbon pollution certificates.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Its pollution reduction stock market is a result of the increasing obtained first from intention emissions trading scheme permissions are necessary. That authority to consume anthracite is authorized more by overall carbon card. People are likely to partake in approach employs albeit less dangerous strategies to cut emissions when such a certificate are sold for one cheap rate.

02

Given Information

This should be emphasized that a polluting ticket can indeed be acquired for as little as $30, less than the cost in fueling a propane barrel for one truck581gigatons pollutants can be created for far less than $100in the Carbon Trading Platform.

03

Explanation

Nevertheless, for reduce emissions by such a large amount, investment in antipollution techniques will run around very few Hundreds of euros into billions of dollars. Thus soon as the price of a global carbon ticket drops significantly, it is more economical that emissions to retain obtaining smaller systems or carbon pollution certificates instead than prepping for air pollutant technology.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Examine the following marginal costs and marginal benefits associated with water cleanliness in a given locale:

a. What is the optimal degree of water cleanliness?

b. What is the optimal degree of water pollution?

c. Suppose that a company creates a food additive that offsets most of the harmful effects of drinking polluted water. As a result, the marginal benefit of water cleanliness declines by $40,000at each degree of water cleanliness at or less than 80 percent. What is the optimal degree of water cleanliness after this change?

The following table gives hypothetical annual total costs and total benefits of maintaining alternative populations of Asian elephants.

a. Calculate the marginal costs and benefits, and draw marginalbenefit and cost schedules.

b. Given the data, what is the socially optimal world population of Asian elephants?

c. Suppose that two events occur simultaneously. Technological development allows machines to do more efficiently much of the work that elephants once did, which reduces by \(10million the marginal benefit of maintaining the elephant population for each 7500increment in the elephant population. In addition, new techniques for breeding, feeding, and protecting elephants reduce the marginal cost by\)40million for each 7500increment in the elephant population. What is the new socially optimal population of Asian elephants?

One possible method for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide is to inject the gases into deep saltwater-laden rock formations, where they would be trapped for thousands of years. Suppose that the federal government provides a fixed per-unit subsidy to firms that utilize this technology in West Virginia and other locales where such rock formations are known to exist.

a. Consider the effects of the government subsidy on the production and sale of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into underground rock formations. What happens to the market clearing price of such pollution abatement equipment?

b. Who pays to achieve the results discussed in part (a)?

The market price of insecticide is initially \(10 per unit. To address a negative externality in this market, the government decides to charge producers of insecticide for the privilege of polluting during the production process. A fee that fully takes into account the social costs of pollution is determined, and once it is put into effect, the market supply curve for insecticide shifts upward by \)4 per unit. The market price of insecticide also increases, to $12 per unit. What fee is the government charging insecticide manufacturers?

Consider the diagram below, which displays the marginal cost and marginal benefit of water pollution abatement in a particular city, and answer the following questions.

a. What is the optimal percentage degree of water cleanliness?

b. When the optimal percentage degree of water cleanliness has been attained, what cost will be incurred for the last unit of water cleanup?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free