Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 31: Q. 31.2LO (page 692)

Explain how economists can conceptually determine the optimal quantity of pollution.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The lowest concentration of pollutants is whether it was prior civilization exacerbated it.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

As optimum level of waste one might contaminate yet nonetheless retaining a diverse ecosystem is just the acceptable value of pollutants.

In thrive, they need contaminate. As either a conclusion, must likewise guarantee ensure the effective prices must not exceeding with us marginal gains.

02

Given Information

Contamination is advantageous toward wider society. The environmentally desirable concentration of pollutants will be zero if fiscal policies remained considered.

03

Explanation

This seems to be and there would be no cost to the taxpayer had there been no trash.

Usually molar value of particles is that if it is enhanced by preceding culture. Such ecology could gradually deteriorate here to stage which can no longer suffice.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Contrast the roles of private and common property rights in problems such as the fates of endangered species

Should policymakers impose additional costly anti-plastics pollution requirements if the marginal benefit of pollution abatement currently equals the marginal cost? Explain.

The market price of insecticide is initially \(10per unit. To address a negative externality in this market, the government decides to charge producers of insecticide for the privilege of polluting during the production process. A fee that fully takes into account the social costs of pollution is determined, and once it is put into effect, the market supply curve for insecticide shifts upward by \)4per unit. The market price of insecticide also increases, to$12 per unit. What fee is the government charging insecticide manufacturers?

Why might allowing profit-maximizing firms to manage the hunting of particular endangered animals potentially help to ensure the animals' species would not disappear? (Hint: Would a company continue to generate profits from selling hunting rights if it allowed hunters to kill all of the animals that it manages?)

One possible method for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide is to inject the gases into deep saltwater-laden rock formations, where they would be trapped for thousands of years. Suppose that the federal government provides a fixed per-unit subsidy to firms that utilize this technology in West Virginia and other locales where such rock formations are known to exist.

a. Consider the effects of the government subsidy on the production and sale of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into underground rock formations. What happens to the market clearing price of such pollution abatement equipment?

b. Who pays to achieve the results discussed in part (a)?
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free