Under an agreement with U.S. regulators, American Electric Power Company of Columbus, Ohio, has agreed to offset part of its 145million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions by paying another company to lay plastic tarps. These tarps cover farm lagoons holding rotting livestock wastes that emit methane gas 21times more damaging to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. The annual methane produced by a typical 1,330pound cow translates into about 5metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year.

a. How many cows' worth of manure would have to be covered to offset the carbon dioxide emissions of this single electric utility?

b. Given that there are about 9 million cows in the United States in a typical year, what percentage of its carbon dioxide emissions could this firm offset if it paid for all cow manure in the entire nation to be covered with tarps?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Carbon pollution of solitary electricity provider, 29million calves' amount or excrement will have to be blanketed.

(b) The percentage of its carbon dioxide emissions could this firm offset is 31.03%.31.03%.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Natural gas is still a on effect, it's a somewhat durable solvent, while combinations of gaseous and ether might keep this much as high as 14 percent. basis points helium per capacity are combustible. Detonations of such a sort having increased alarmingly throughout mines and steelworks, leading across several industrial disasters.

02

Explanation (a)

a. Both pipe energy provider creates 145millions of pounds of carbon dioxide.

It should always be emphasized that the one 1330-pound heifer (manure) releases 5tons of carbon every year.

Consequently, estimated number of cattle necessary fully counterbalance overall carbon pollution of such a particular utility company would indeed remark:

145million_metric_ton_ofCO25metric_ton_ofCO2

=29million

Because counteract a single electrical lender's whole climate impact, a million cattle' load clean dung must still be buried.

03

Explanation (b)

b. Whereas a typical year and have 9 million heifers. That amount of carbon created by several cows' feces is:

9million cows×5metric ton ofCO2per_Cow

localid="1652509624814" =45_metric_ton_of_CO2

That percent of carbon pollution avoided if a local electricity provider paid for blankets that hide all cattle fertilizers is:

45metric_ton_ofCO2145metric_ton_of_CO2

=31.03%

As both a result, the amount of Dioxide emissions mitigated as localid="1652683418238" 31.03%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The market price of insecticide is initially \(10per unit. To address a negative externality in this market, the government decides to charge producers of insecticide for the privilege of polluting during the production process. A fee that fully takes into account the social costs of pollution is determined, and once it is pat into effect, the market supply curve for insecticide shifts upward by \)4 per unit. The market price of insecticide also increases, to $12 per unit. What fee is the government charging insecticide manufacturers?

Take a look at Figure 31-2. Suppose that initially, society experiences a degree of air cleanliness that is lower than Q0. What would be true of the marginal benefit in relation to the marginal cost, and why would this fact induce society to increase the degree of air cleanliness toward Q0?

Contrast the roles of private and common property rights in problems such as the fates of endangered species

Examine the following marginal costs and marginal benefits associated with water cleanliness in a given locale:

a. What is the optimal degree of water cleanliness?

b. What is the optimal degree of water pollution?

c. Suppose that a company creates a food additive that offsets most of the harmful effects of drinking polluted water. As a result, the marginal benefit of water cleanliness declines by $40,000at each degree of water cleanliness at or less than 80 percent. What is the optimal degree of water cleanliness after this change?

The following table gives hypothetical annual total costs and total benefits of maintaining alternative populations of Asian elephants.

a. Calculate the marginal costs and benefits, and draw marginal benefit and cost schedules.

b. Given the data, what is the socially optimal world population of Asian elephants?

c. Suppose that two events occur simultaneously. Technological development allows machines to do more efficiently much of the work that elephants once did, which reduces by \(10million the marginal benefit of maintaining the elephant population for each 7,500increment in the elephant population. In addition, new techniques for breeding, feeding, and protecting elephants reduce the marginal cost by \)40million for each 7,500increment in the elephant population. What is the new socially optimal population of Asian elephants?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free