Suppose that a new chief of the government agency discussed in Problem 31-7decides to reduce the number of pollution allowances that firms are permitted to own. Evaluate the effects this policy change will have on the market price of pollution allowances, and discuss whether the policy appears to be fully consistent with the original intent of creating the market for these allowances.

Short Answer

Expert verified

An effect on the value on licenses, which would in response have an effect on overall pollution level emitted.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Overall current price is really the existing cost of obtaining as well as distributing some property a business. Economic principles that supply side affect the market price of the product a product. An equilibrium price is actually upon which number given balances volume sought.

02

Given Information

That allocative efficiency is really the perfect healthy sector. Deviations are caused with govt intervention. But, there's a few items for whom no competition exists, forcing state intervention.

03

Explanation

  • As head of the state office considers that perhaps the firm's usage pollutant licenses should really be reduced. Such regulation will get an effect on the value on licenses, which would in response have an effect on overall pollution level emitted.
  • Such legislative modification can have a favorable impact on overall allowance charges, but request of rights could decline as costs increase.
  • So competitive price is going up, and indeed the average requirement for concessions should decline. As both a sense, our program becomes instrumental in attaining their objectives.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the diagram in Problem 31-4, and answer the following questions.

a. Suppose that a new technology for reducing water pollution generates a reduction in the marginal cost of pollution abatement at every degree of water cleanliness. After this event occurs, will the optimal percentage degree of water cleanliness rise or fall? Will the cost incurred for the last unit of water cleanup increase or decrease? Provide a diagram to assist in your explanation.

b. Suppose that the event discussed in part (a) occurs and that, in addition, medical studies determine that the marginal benefit from water pollution abatement is higher at every degree of water cleanliness. Following both events, will the optimal percentage degree of water cleanliness increase or decrease? In comparison with the initial optimum, can you determine whether the cost incurred for the last unit of water cleanup will increase or decrease? Use a new diagram to assist in explaining your answers.

One possible method for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide is to inject the gases into deep saltwater-laden rock formations, where they would be trapped for thousands of years. Suppose that the federal government provides a fixed per-unit subsidy to firms that utilize this technology in West Virginia and other locales where such rock formations are known to exist.

a. Consider the effects of the government subsidy on the production and sale of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into underground rock formations. What happens to the market clearing price of such pollution abatement equipment?

b. Who pays to achieve the results discussed in part (a)?

Under an agreement with U.S. regulators, American Electric Power Company of Columbus, Ohio, has agreed to offset part of its 145million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions by paying another company to lay plastic tarps. These tarps cover farm lagoons holding rotting livestock wastes that emit methane gas 21times more damaging to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. The annual methane produced by a typical 1,330pound cow translates into about 5metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year.

a. How many cows' worth of manure would have to be covered to offset the carbon dioxide emissions of this single electric utility?

b. Given that there are about 9 million cows in the United States in a typical year, what percentage of its carbon dioxide emissions could this firm offset if it paid for all cow manure in the entire nation to be covered with tarps?

Why might allowing profit-maximizing firms to manage the hunting of particular endangered animals potentially help to ensure the animals' species would not disappear? (Hint: Would a company continue to generate profits from selling hunting rights if it allowed hunters to kill all of the animals that it manages?)

The table below shows the estimated annual total costs and benefits of maintaining Asian elephant populations in their natural habitat.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free