What is the specific reason that accounting for externalities and thereby shifting the market supply curve causes the equilibrium quantity of Good X to decline from Q1 to Q2?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The lower the amount, the lower will be the contamination. Accordingly, when the cost of a negative externality is thought about the socially ideal amount is lower than the confidential ideal.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

A confidential firm will create where the marginal cost is equivalent to the marginal advantage. This is given by the crossing point of the demand (marginal advantage) curve and the supply (marginal cost) curves.

02

Explanation

The confidential ideal degree of Good X is Q1and the confidential ideal cost is P1However, since creation accompanies a negative externality as contamination, the cost of this should be added to the confidential cost to show up at the social cost. Once, the cost of the externality is added to the confidential cost the supply curve or the marginal cost curve of the firm moves up to one side to S2The new harmony happens at point E2The net impact of including the externality to the cost of the firm is a lower amount of Good X and a more exorbitant cost of Good X.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Contrast the roles of private and common property rights in problems such as the fates of endangered species

Describe how governments are trying to cap the use of pollution-generating resources

Consider the diagram below, which displays the marginal cost and marginal benefit of water pollution abatement in a particular city, and answer the following questions.

a. What is the optimal percentage degree of water cleanliness?

b. When the optimal percentage degree of water cleanliness has been attained, what cost will be incurred for the last unit of water cleanup?

Why might a low-income nation with a currently very high degree of air cleanliness view a higher pollution level created by newly relocated plants of Chinese firms as optimal?

Under an agreement with U.S. regulators, American Electric Power Company of Columbus, Ohio, has agreed to offset part of its 145million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions by paying another company to lay plastic tarps. These tarps cover farm lagoons holding rotting livestock wastes that emit methane gas 21times more damaging to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. The annual methane produced by a typical 1,330pound cow translates into about 5metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year.

a. How many cows' worth of manure would have to be covered to offset the carbon dioxide emissions of this single electric utility?

b. Given that there are about 9 million cows in the United States in a typical year, what percentage of its carbon dioxide emissions could this firm offset if it paid for all cow manure in the entire nation to be covered with tarps?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free