A government is currently operating with an annual budget deficit of \(40 billion. The government has determined that every \)10 billion reduction in the amount it borrows each year would reduce the market interest rate by 0.1 percentage point. Furthermore, it has determined that every 0.1-percentage-point change in the market interest rate generates a change in planned investment expenditures in the opposite direction equal to \(5 billion. The marginal propensity to consume is 0.75. Finally, the government knows that to eliminate an inflationary gap and take into account the resulting change in the price level, it must generate a net leftward shift in the aggregate demand curve equal to \)40 billion. Assuming that there are no direct expenditure offsets to fiscal policy, how much should the government increase taxes? (Hint: How much new private investment spending is induced by each $10 billion decrease in government spending? )

Short Answer

Expert verified

As a result, the amount of tax hike that reduces aggregate demand by $40 billion is $40 billion.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction 

The given is the annual budget deficit of the government $40billion

The objective is to determine how much should the government increase taxes

02

Explanation  

Every ten-billion-dollar reduction in the amount the government borrows boosts private investment by five-billion-dollars. In other words, for every x reduction in government borrowing, 0.5x dollars is lost in private investment.

0.75 is the marginal propensity to consume.

03

Explanation 

To achieve a net leftward shift of $40 billion in the aggregate demand curve, the government must raise taxes. To put it another way, the government needs to raise taxes to produce a net reduction in aggregate demand of $40 billion.

04

Calculation 

Assume that an increase in taxes of xreduces aggregate demand by $40billion.

Changes in AD are solely related to a tax increase of xdollars.

=-MPC1-MPC×x

=-0.751-0.75×x=-3x

An increase in tax of xdollars will result in a decrease in government borrowing of xdollars, which will result in a decrease in private investment of 0.5xdollars.

Change in $mathrmAD$ as a result of a drop in private investment of 0.5xdollars.

=11-MPC×0.5x

=11-0.75×0.5x=2x

Calculate the value of xas follows:

Total change in AD=-$40billion(-3x)+(2x)=-$40billion

-x=-40billionx=40billion

As a result, a tax increase of $40 billion reduces aggregate demand by $40 billion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The U.S. government is in the midst of spending more than \(1 billion on seven buildings containing more than 100,000 square feet of space to be used for the study of infectious diseases. Prior to the government's decision to construct these buildings, a few universities had been planning to build essentially the same facilities using privately obtained funds. After construction on the government buildings began, however, the universities dropped their plans. Evaluate whether the government's \)1 billion expenditure is actually likely to push U.S. real GDP above the level it would have reached in the absence of the government's construction spree.

List and define fiscal policy time lags and explain why they complicate efforts to engage in fiscal "fine tuning".

Use traditional Keynesian analysis to evaluate the effects of discretionary fiscal policies.

Determine whether each of the following is an example of an automatic fiscal stabilizer.

a. A federal agency must extend loans to businesses whenever an economic downturn begins.

b. As the economy heats up, the resulting increase in equilibrium real GDP per year immediately results in higher income tax payments, which dampen consumption spending somewhat.

c. As the economy starts to recover from a severe recession and more people go back to work, government-funded unemployment compensation payments begin to decline.

d. To stem an overheated economy, the president, using special powers granted by Congress, authorizes emergency impoundment of funds that Congress had previously authorized for spending on govemment programs.

Suppose that Congress enacts a lump-sum tax cut of $750 billion. The marginal propensity to consume is equal to 0.75. Assuming that Ricardian equivalence holds true, what is the effect on equilibrium real GDP? On saving?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free