A government is currently operating with an annual budget deficit of \(40 billion. The government has determined that every \)10 billion reduction in the amount it borrows each year would reduce the market interest rate by 0.1 percentage point. Furthermore, it has determined that every 0.1-percentage-point change in the market interest rate generates a change in planned investment expenditures in the opposite direction equal to \(5 billion. The marginal propensity to consume is 0.75. Finally, the government knows that to eliminate an inflationary gap and take into account the resulting change in the price level, it must generate a net leftward shift in the aggregate demand curve equal to \)40 billion. Assuming that there are no direct expenditure offsets to fiscal policy, how much should the government increase taxes? (Hint: How much new private investment spending is induced by each $10 billion decrease in government spending? )

Short Answer

Expert verified

As a result, the amount of tax hike that reduces aggregate demand by $40 billion is $40 billion.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction 

The given is the annual budget deficit of the government $40billion

The objective is to determine how much should the government increase taxes

02

Explanation  

Every ten-billion-dollar reduction in the amount the government borrows boosts private investment by five-billion-dollars. In other words, for every x reduction in government borrowing, 0.5x dollars is lost in private investment.

0.75 is the marginal propensity to consume.

03

Explanation 

To achieve a net leftward shift of $40 billion in the aggregate demand curve, the government must raise taxes. To put it another way, the government needs to raise taxes to produce a net reduction in aggregate demand of $40 billion.

04

Calculation 

Assume that an increase in taxes of xreduces aggregate demand by $40billion.

Changes in AD are solely related to a tax increase of xdollars.

=-MPC1-MPC×x

=-0.751-0.75×x=-3x

An increase in tax of xdollars will result in a decrease in government borrowing of xdollars, which will result in a decrease in private investment of 0.5xdollars.

Change in $mathrmAD$ as a result of a drop in private investment of 0.5xdollars.

=11-MPC×0.5x

=11-0.75×0.5x=2x

Calculate the value of xas follows:

Total change in AD=-$40billion(-3x)+(2x)=-$40billion

-x=-40billionx=40billion

As a result, a tax increase of $40 billion reduces aggregate demand by $40 billion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Determine whether each of the following is an example of a situation in which there is indirect crowding out resulting from an expansionary fiscal policy action.

a. The government provides a subsidy to help keep an existing firm operating, even though a group of investors otherwise would have provided a cash infusion that would have kept the company in business.

b. The government reduces its taxes without decreasing its expenditures. To cover the resulting budget deficit, it borrows more funds from the private sector, thereby pushing up the market interest rate and discouraging private planned investment spending.

c. Government expenditures fund construction of a high-rise office building on a plot of land where a private company otherwise would have constructed an essentially identical building.

Suppose that Congress and the president decide that the nation's economic performance is weakening and that the government should "do something" about the situation. They make no tax changes but do enact new laws increasing government spending on a variety of programs.

a. Prior to the congressional and presidential action, careful studies by government economists indicated that the Keynesian multiplier effect of a rise in government expenditures on equilibrium real GDP per year is equal to 3. In the 12 months since the increase in government spending, however, it has become clear that the actual ultimate effect on real GDP will be less than half of that amount. What factors might account for this?

b. Another year and a half elapses following passage of the government spending boost. The government has undertaken no additional policy actions, nor have there been any other events of significance. Nevertheless, by the end of the second year, real GDP has returned to its original level, and the price level has increased sharply, Provide a possible explanation for this outcome.

2. Why do you suppose that some economists have argued that a key determinant of a nation's stabilization coefficient value is whether its government relies to a greater extent on automatic fiscal stabilizers instead of discretionary policy actions?

In May and June of 2008, the federal government issued one-time tax rebates - checks returning a small portion of taxes previously paid to millions of U.S residents, and U.S. real disposable income temporarily jumped by nearly $500 billion. Household real consumption spending did not increase in response to the short-lived increase in real disposable income. Explain how the logic of the permanent income hypothesis might help to account for this apparent non relationship between real consumption and real disposable income in the late spring of 2008.

Determine whether each of the following is an example of discretionary fiscal policy action.

a. A recession occurs, and government-funded unemployment compensation is paid to laid-off workers.

b. Congress votes to fund a new jobs program designed to pat unemployed workers to work.

c. The Federal Reserve decides to reduce the quantity of money in circulation in an effort to slow inflation.

d. Under powers authorized by an act of Congress, the president decides to authorize an emergency release of funds for spending programs intended to head off economic crises.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free