Suppose that Congress enacts a lump-sum tax cut of $750 billion. The marginal propensity to consume is equal to 0.75. Assuming that Ricardian equivalence holds true, what is the effect on equilibrium real GDP? On saving?

Short Answer

Expert verified

As a result, it is evident that tax cuts have no impact on actual GDP or savings.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction 

The given is the assumption of Congress enacting a lump sum tax cut of $750billion

The objective is to determine the effect on equilibrium real GDP on saving

02

Step 1 

According to the Ricardian equivalence theorem, a government's attempt to stimulate demand by raising debt-financed government spending has no impact on aggregate demand.

In general, if the government enacts a $750 billion lump-sum tax cut, aggregate demand will be reduced. Because as taxes rise, the amount of money in circulation decreases. As a result, people will have less purchasing power in this situation.

However, an increase or decrease in tax keeps real GDP and saving constant, according to Ricardian equivalence thesis.

As a result, it is evident that a tax cut has no effect on real GDP or savings.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that MPC= 45when answering the following questions.

a. If government expenditures rise by \( 2 billion, by how much will the aggregate expenditure curve shift upward? By how much will equilibrium real GDP per year change?

b. If taxes increase by \) 2 billion, by how much will the aggregate expenditure curve shift downward? By how much will equilibrium real GDP per year change?

Consider the diagram below, in which the current short-run equilibrium is at point A, and answer the questions that follow.

a. What type of gap exists at point A?

b. If the marginal propensity to save equals 0.02, what change in government spending financed by borrowing from the private sector could eliminate the gap identified in part (a)? Explain.

If a government agency decided to fund the construction of a private hospital in an area in which other private hospitals already are just breaking even, why might one of the other private hospitals cancel plans to expand the size of its facility?

Explain how time lags in discretionary fiscal policy making could thwart the efforts of Congress and the president to stabilize real GDP in the face of an economic downturn. Is it possible that these time lags could actually cause the discretionary fiscal policy to destabilize real GDP?

Recall that the Keynesian spending multiplier equals 1 /(1-MPC). Suppose that in panel (a) of Figure 13-1, the government determined that the amount by which the AD curve had to be shifted directly rightward from the point E1 was equal to \(1.0 trillion. If the government decided that a \)0.2 trillion increase in real government spending was required to generate this shift, what must be the value of the MPC?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free