A government has found that 2 months elapse before it can identify a problem to address with policy action. It has been found that 1 month is required to determine the appropriate policy action. Finally, it has been concluded that the total time required between the initial presence of the problem and the effects of a policy action to be realized is 12 months. What are the remaining policy time lag and its duration?

Short Answer

Expert verified

the remaining policy time lag is effectiveness lag and its duration is nine months.

Step by step solution

01

introduction

Recognition lag alludes to the time it takes an administration to detect an issue that needs an arrangement activity.

Implementation lag alludes to the time it takes an administration to figure out a reasonable approach to tackle the front and centre issue.

Effectiveness lag alludes to the time a monetary approach takes to achieve the ideal result

02

explanation

The public authority requires a month to think of a fitting arrangement to tackle the issue.

Hence, the implementation lag = 1month.

12months pass from the time the issue is perceived to the time the impacts of the picked arrangement are felt. It implies that the three lags are spread over a time of the year

Total time elapsed = recognition lag + implementation lag + effectiveness lag.

calculating the remaining lag and its duration

12months = 2month + 1month + effectiveness lag.

Thus, effectiveness lag = 12-3= 9

Hence the duration is 9months.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that the Ricardian equivalence theorem is not relevant. Explain why an income-tax-rate cut should affect short-run equilibrium real GDP.

Assume that MPC= 45when answering the following questions.

a. If government expenditures rise by \( 2 billion, by how much will the aggregate expenditure curve shift upward? By how much will equilibrium real GDP per year change?

b. If taxes increase by \) 2 billion, by how much will the aggregate expenditure curve shift downward? By how much will equilibrium real GDP per year change?

It is late 2019 , and the U.S. economy is showing signs of slipping into a potentially deep recession. Government policymakers are searching for income-tax-policy changes that will bring about a significant and lasting boost to real consumption spending. According to the logic of the permanent income hypothesis, should the proposed income-tax-policy changes involve tax increases or tax reductions, and should the policy changes be short-lived or long-lasting?

Consider the diagram below, in which the current short-run equilibrium is at point A, and answer the questions that follow.

a. What type of gap exists at point A?

b. If the marginal propensity to save equals 0.02, what change in government spending financed by borrowing from the private sector could eliminate the gap identified in part (a)? Explain.

Explain how time lags in discretionary fiscal policy making could thwart the efforts of Congress and the president to stabilize real GDP in the face of an economic downturn. Is it possible that these time lags could actually cause the discretionary fiscal policy to destabilize real GDP?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free