Why does it appear to be difficult to assess whether there is a direct or inverse relationship between inequality and economic growth?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It appears to be difficult to assess whether there is a direct or inverse relationship between inequality and economic growth.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

The possibility of the connections between economic inequality and economic growth starts with a lower level of inequality and along these lines will in general become quicker and have longer times of growth than those with a more elevated level of inequality.

02

Explanation part (1)

Inequality implies divergence or inequality between public activity, economic construction, and dissemination among the people of a country. Economic inequality shed the light on the view of distinction on the boundary measurements like riches, pay, and utilization.

03

part (2)

Analyzing the consequences of negative and positive connections between inequality and economic growth, then, at that point, it implies that it can't give a superior explanation that serves inequality or counter the impacts on the economic growth

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In 2018, a nation's population was 10million, its real GDP was role="math" localid="1651518280695" \(1.21billion, and its GDP deflator had a value of 121. By 2019, its population had increased torole="math" localid="1651518397677" 12million, its real GDP had risen to \)1.5billion, and its GDP deflator had a value ofrole="math" localid="1651518422407" 125 . What was the percentage change in per capita real GDP between2018 and 2019 ?

In the situation described in Problem 9-2, suppose that vocational training during the past year enables the people of this nation to repair all capital goods so that they continue to function as well as new. All other factors are unchanged, however. In light of this single change to the conditions faced in this nation, will the nation's economic growth rate for the current year be negative, zero, or positive?

Explain why productivity growth, saving, and new technologies are crucial for maintaining economic growth

A nation's per capita real GDP was$2,000 in 2017, and the nation's population was5 million in that year. Between 2017 and 2018, the inflation rate in this country was role="math" localid="1651519423079" 5 percent, and the nation's annual rate of economic growth was 10 percent. Its population remained unchanged. What was per capita real GDP in 2018? What was the level of real GDP in2018?

Based on data in Table 9-1and in Table 9-3, if China's per capita real GDP continues to grow at the average rate it has experienced since 1990, will its per capita real GDP be twice as high as it is today within a decade? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free