Consider a nation with a government that does not provide people with property rights for a number of items and that fails to enforce the property rights it does not assign for the remaining items. Would externality be more or less in this nation than in a country such as the United States? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The externality will be more for the nation as compared to the United States.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Define Externality.

An externality is a consequence of an economic activity that affects the third party. For example, pollution is an externality.

02

Step 2. Externality more or less.

The externality will be more for the nation as compared to the United States.

People will be opening shops wherever they can and will be illegally using items that do not have any property rights. Which will lead to a greater setback for the citizens of the nation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Who provides the \(16 billion paid to Medicare's "1 percent" every year- alongside the additional \)74 billion in payments to the other 99 percent of the physicians who receive payments from Medicare?

Consider the market for a health care service displayed in Figure, in which the government currently pays a per-unit subsidy M.If the government raises the value of M to a larger dollar amount per unit of service, what will happen to the out-of-pocket price paid by consumers, the price required to induce suppliers to provide services, and the number of services provided? Will the government's total expense for this health care service rise or fall?

Distinguish between private goods and public goods and explain the nature of the free-rider problem.

A government offers to let a number of students at a public school transfer to a private school under two conditions: It will transmit to the private school the same per-pupil subsidy it provides the public school, and the private school will be required to admit the students at a below-market net tuition rate. Will the economic outcome be the same as the one that would have arisen if the government instead simply provided students with grants to cover the current market tuition rate at the private school? (Hint: Does it matter if schools receive payments directly from the government or from consumers?)

Suppose that the current price of a tablet device is \(300 and that people are buying 1 million devices per year. The government decides to begin subsidizing the purchase of new tablet devices. The government believes that the appropriate price is \)260 per tablet, so the program offers to send people cash for the difference between \(260 and whatever the people pay for each tablet they buy.

(a) If no consumers change their tablet-buying behavior, how much will this program cost the taxpayers?

(b) Will the subsidy cause people to buy more, fewer, or the same number of tablets? Explain.

(c) Suppose that people end up buying 1.5 million tablets once the program is in place. If the market price of tablets does not change, how much will this program cost the taxpayers?

(d) Under the assumption that the program causes people to buy 1.5 million tablets and also causes the market price of tablets to rise to \)320, how much will this program cost the taxpayers?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free