Consider the data from Problem 27-11. Suppose that antitrust authorities have determined that there are separate relevant markets for e-books and physical books. In addition, these authorities perceive that a monopoly situation exists that can be challenged on legal grounds if the value of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index exceeds 5000 . On the basis of this criterion, do the antitrust authorities conclude that there are grounds for a legal challenge in either market? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

BecauseHHI's market value in physical books is less than 5000, antitrust regulators can conclude that there is no basis for a legal challenge in the physical-books market.

Because the value of HHI in the E-books market above 5000, financial regulators can assume that the E-books market justifies legal action.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction.

The term "e-book" refers to a digital book. All pages of an e-book are in digital format, which implies the book has been converted to an electronic format.

02

Given Data.

The value of the Herfindahl-Hirschman index for the e-book market is calculated as follows:

HHI=752+52+52+52+52+52

HHI=5625+25+25+25+25+25

HHI=5750

For the e-book market, the herfindahl-hirschman index has a value of5750.

03

Explanation.

If the value of HHIexceeds role="math" localid="1652192750333" 5000, authorities believe a monopoly situation exists in the market, which can be contested on legal grounds.

Since the price of HHIin the E-books market above 5000, antitrust authorities can decide that the E-books market warrants legal action.

04

Introduction

Physical books are referred to as printed books. Physical books are referred to as printed books.

05

Given data.

The value of the Herfindahl-Hirschman index for the e-book market is calculated as follows:

HHI=422+202+19.52+4.52+42

HHI=1764+400+380.5+20.25+16

HHI=2580.5

For the e-book market, the herfindahl-hirschman index has a value of2580.5.

06

Explanation.

If the value of HHIexceeds5000, authorities believe a monopoly situation exists in the market, which can be contested on legal grounds.

Because HHI's market value in physical books is less than 5000, antitrust authorities can infer that there is no basis for a legal challenge in the physical-books market.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why do you suppose that the U.S. Transportation Department has been considering new regulations mandating that states construct parking facilities for trucks?

A firm that sells both Internet-security software and computer antivirus software will sell the antivirus software as a stand-alone product. It will only sell the Internet-security software to consumers in a combined package that also includes the antivirus software. What is this business practice called?

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Explain the main rationales for regulation of industries that are not inherently monopolistic

Why do you suppose that assigning market shares, regions, or customers and exchanging sales information are the most common means of coordinating collusion?

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Recognize the practical difficulties in regulating the prices charged by natural monopolies

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free