Suppose that in Fig 2-4, the nation currently has sufficient resources to produce combinations located along only the innermost production possibilities curve. In addition, suppose that the nation's residents have determined that smartphones function mainly as consumption goods while tablet devices function primarily as capital goods. If the nation produces no additional tablets this year, will the intermediate-shifted PPC resulting from minimal economic growth or the farthest shifted PPC caused by more significant economic growth be more likely to apply next year?

Short Answer

Expert verified

No it won't.

Step by step solution

01

Step1. Given information

Given it is that the nation does not have enough resources and can only produce at the inner, inferior combinations of the PPC curve.

02

Step2. Explanation

The growth of any country is linked to the production of capital goods primarily. If a country is able to produce more, that is because the support of the production of capital goods exist. But, here since the question says there is no production of capital goods, there might not be any expansion of production. So, there is no shift in PPC/PPF.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Discuss why obtaining increasing increments of any particular good typically entails giving up more and more units of other goods.

If the U.N. follows through on a proposal to add production targets for 148 more items to its Sustainable Development Goals, why might we expect that the opportunity cost in terms of other goods and services that must be forgone could be even greater? Explain briefly.

Suppose that in Fig 2-2, the nation currently is producing combination D in the table and on the graph of the production possibilities curve. What is the opportunity cost of producing 20 million more tablet devices and moving to production combination F?

Recently, a woman named Mary Krawiec attended an auction in Troy, New York. At the auction, a bank was seeking to sell a foreclosed property: a large Victorian house suffering from years of neglect in a neighborhood in which many properties had been on the market for years yet remained unsold. Her \(10 offer was the highest bid in the auction, and she handed over a \)10 bill for a title to ownership. Once she acquired the house, however, she became responsible for all taxes on the property and for an overdue water bill of \(2,000. In addition, to make the house habitable, she and her husband devoted months of time and unpaid labor to renovating the property. In the process, they incurred explicit expenses totaling \)65,000. Why do you suppose that the bank was willing to sell the house to Ms. Krawiec for only $10? (Hint: Contemplate the bank’s expected gain, net of all explicit and opportunity costs, if it had attempted to make the house habitable.)

During a debate on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Senator Creighton states, “Our nation should not devote so many of its fully employed resources to producing capital goods because we already are not producing enough consumption goods for our citizens.” Compared with the other labeled points on the diagram, which one could be consistent with the current product combination choice that Senator Creighton believes the nation has made?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free