Recently, a bank was trying to decide what fee to charge for “expedited payments”—payments that the bank would transmit extra-speedily to enable customers to avoid late fees on cable TV bills, electric bills, and the like. To try to determine what fee customers were willing to pay for expedited payments, the bank conducted a survey. It was able to determine that many of the people surveyed already paid fees for expedited payment services that exceeded the maximum fees that they said they were willing to pay. How does the bank’s finding relate to economists’ traditional focus on what people do, rather than what they say they will do?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The reaction is based on bounded rational behavior.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Bounded Rational Behavior.

Bounded rationality behavior explains that people are rational but not completely as they do not examine every possible choice given to them but instead sort among the alternatives.

02

Step 2. The bank's finding.

The bank's finding shows that the people show bounded rational behavior. Despite being given various choices agree to pay more than their willingness by a simple method.to make a decision.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Given the function y=8-2x, complete the following schedule and plot the curve.

y
x

-4

-2

0

2

4

Write a sentence contrasting positive and normative economic analysis.

Consider two models for estimating, in advance of an election, the shares of votes that will go to rival candidates. According to one model, pollsters’ surveys of a randomly chosen set of registered voters before an election can be used to forecast the percentage of votes that each candidate will receive. This first model relies on the assumption that unpaid survey respondents will give truthful responses about how they will vote and that they will actually cast a ballot in the election. The other model uses prices of financial assets (legally binding IOUs) issued by the Iowa Electronic Markets, operated by the University of Iowa, to predict electoral outcomes. The final payments received by owners of these assets, which can be bought or sold during the weeks and days preceding an election, depending on the shares of votes the candidates actually end up receiving. This second model assumes that owners of these assets wish to earn the highest possible returns, and it indicates that the market prices of these assets provide an indication of the percentage of votes that each candidate will actually receive on the day of the election.

(a) Which of these two models for forecasting electoral results is more firmly based on the rationality assumption of economics?

(b) How would an economist evaluate which is the better model for forecasting electoral outcomes?

Under the rationality assumption, could a woman potentially take into account her family's welfare as well as her own when considering having another child? Explain your reasoning.

How do you suppose the higher taxes have affected the incentive for Greek residents to engage in tax avoidance, or legally reduce tax liabilities, including earning less income that is subjected to taxation?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free