Although a production possibilities frontier is usually drawn for a country, one could be drawn for the world. Picture the world's production possibilities frontier. Is the world positioned at a point on the PPF or below it? Give a reason for your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Given that the world is not efficiently utilizing all available resources, due to factors such as unemployment, inequality, and inefficient allocation of resources, it can be argued that the world is operating at a point below its Production Possibilities Frontier.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concept of PPF

First, it's crucial to understand what the Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF) represents. The PPF is a model in economics that shows the maximum combinations of two goods or services that can be produced in a set time period within an economy when all resources are fully and efficiently utilized.
02

Consider the Current State of the World Economy

Next, consider the state of the world's economy. Are all resources being fully and efficiently utilized? Remember that inefficiency, unemployment, unused resources and sub-optimal allocation of resources could indicate that the world is operating beneath its PPF.
03

Construct Your Answer

Finally, construct your answer based on your understanding of the PPF and the current economic state. Remember that while the PPF is a theoretical model and in reality it is nearly impossible for an economy, let alone the world economy, to be operating at the exact point on the PPF, as there will always be some inefficiencies and unused resources.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Some economists have argued that, because domestic consumers gain more from free trade than domestic producers gain from (import) tariffs and quotas, consumers should buy out domestic producers and rid themselves of costly tariffs and quotas. For example, if consumers save $$\$ 400$$ million from free trade (through paying lower prices) and producers gain $$\$ 100$$ million from tariffs and quotas, consumers can pay producers something more than $$\$ 100$$ million but less than $$\$ 400$$ million and get producers to favor free trade too. Assuming that this scheme were feasible, what do you think of it?

Consider two groups of domestic producers: those which compete with imports and those which export goods. Suppose the domestic producers that compete with imports convince the legislature to impose a high tariff on imports-so high, in fact, that almost all imports are eliminated. Does this policy in any way adversely affect domestic producers that export goods? If so, how?

If there is a net loss to society from tariffs, why do tariffs exist?

Suppose that a constitutional convention is called tomorrow and that you are chosen as one of the delegates from your state. You and the other delegates must decide whether it will be constitutional or unconstitutional for the federal government to impose tariffs and quotas or to restrict international trade in any way. What would be your position?

The desire for profit can end up pushing countries toward producing goods in which they have a comparative advantage. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free