Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 17: Q8. (page 368)

The U.S. government issues longer-term bonds with horizons of up to 30 years. Why do 20-year bonds issued by the U.S. government have lower rates of return than 20-year bonds issued by corporations? And which do you think has the higher rate of return, longer-term U.S. government bonds or short-term U.S. government bonds? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The 20-year bonds issued by the U.S. government have lower rates of return than 20-year bonds issued by corporations because the bonds issued by the government are less risky.

The longer-term U.S. government bonds have a higher rate of return than the short-term U.S. government bonds.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Lower returns on government bonds compared to corporations

The higher the risk associated with the asset, the higher are the returns. The bonds issued by the U.S government are considered less risky than the bonds issued by the corporations. So, U.S. government bonds have lower rates of return.

02

Step 2. Higher returns on long term government bonds 

The longer-term U.S government bonds have a higher return than the short run because the investors need high returns as compensation for waiting for the longer term.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why is it reasonable to ignore diversifiable risk and care only about non-diversifiable risk? What about investors who put all their money into only a single risky stock? Can they properly ignore diversifiable risk?

Corporations often distribute profits to their shareholders in the form of dividends, which are quarterly payments sent to shareholders. Suppose that you have the chance to buy a share in a fashion company called Rogue Designs for \(35 and that the company will pay dividends of \)2 per year on that share. What is the annual percentage rate of return? Next, suppose that you and other investors could get a 12 percent per year rate of return on the stocks of other very similar fashion companies. If investors care only about rates of return, what should happen to the share price of Rogue Designs? (Hint: This is an arbitrage situation.)

Consider an asset that costs \(120 today. You are going to hold it for 1 year and then sell it. Suppose that there is a 25 percent chance that it will be worth \)100 in a year, a 25 percent chance that it will be worth \(115 in a year, and a 50 percent chance that it will be worth \)140 in a year. What is its average expected rate of return? Next, figure out what the investment’s average expected rate of return would be if its current price were $130 today. Does the increase in the current price increase or decrease the asset’s average expected rate of return? At what price would the asset have a zero average expected rate of return?

If we compare the betas of various investment opportunities, why do the assets that have higher betas also have higher average expected rates of return?

What determines the vertical intercept of the Security Market Line (SML)? What determines its slope? And what will happen to an asset’s price if it initially plots onto a point above the SML?
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free