Because investment and capital goods are paid for with savings, higher savings rates reflect a decision to consume fewer goods in the present to invest in more goods for the future. Households in China save 40 percent of their annual incomes each year, whereas U.S. households save less than 5 percent. At the same time, production possibilities are growing at roughly 7 percent per year in China but only about 3.0 percent per year in the United States. Use graphical analysis of ‘present goods’ versus ‘future goods’ to explain the difference between China's growth rate and the U.S. growth rate.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The growth rate of China is higher than that of the U.S., as shown in the graph below.

Step by step solution

01

Consumption in China and in the U.S. at present

A nation spends its income on consumption and savings. Whatever a nation saves is used as investment by it in the future. As China holds 40% of its income, it is consuming 60% and keeping the remaining 40% for the future.

Y=C+S=0.6Y+0.4Y

As the production possibilities for China are increasing by 7% each year, the amount saved for the future increases by 7%, and the present consumption decreases by the same. Therefore, the curve is negatively sloped.

Similarly, the U.S. consumes approximately 97% and saves 3% for the future. The future goods for the U.S. progress by 3% every year.So, the graph for the growth of the U.S. is negatively sloped, declining by 3% constantly.

02

Comparing the growth rate of China and that of the U.S.

In the above graph, the pink curve represents the growth rate of China, and the blue curve represents that of the U.S. China consumes 60% of its income at present and saves 40% for future goods, and the U.S. consumes 97% in the present goods and saves 3% for future goods, as shown in the graph.

China will consume 100% income in the future after some years, growing by a rate of 7%, while the U.S. will achieve 100% consumption in the future, growing by 3%. As the graph for China's growth rate is steeper compared to the U.S., China will reach 100% consumption in the future in less time.

On the other hand, the present consumption in the U.S. is very high, while the curve is flatter. So, the U.S. will take more time to reach the full consumption level in the future. Therefore, the growth rate of China is higher than that of the U.S.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Pham can work as many or as few hours as she wants at the college bookstore for \(12 per hour. But due to her hectic schedule, she has just 15 hours per week that she can spend working at either the bookstore or other potential jobs. One potential job at a café will pay her \)15 per hour for up to 6 hours per week. She has another job offer at a garage that will pay her \(13 an hour for up to 5 hours per week. And she has a potential job at a daycare center that will pay her \)11.50 per hour for as many hours as she can work. If her goal is to maximize the amount of money she can make each week, how many hours will she work at the bookstore?

Cite three examples of recent decisions you made in which you, at least implicitly, weighed marginal cost and marginal benefit.

Suppose that based on a nation's production possibilities curve, an economy must sacrifice 10,000 pizzas domestically to get the one additional industrial robot it desires, but it can get the robot from another country in exchange for 9,000 pizzas. Relate this information to the following statement. "Through international specialization and trade, a nation can reduce its opportunity cost of obtaining goods and thus move outside its production possibilities curve."

Potatoes cost Janice \(1 per pound, and she has \)5.00 that she could possibly spend on potatoes or other items. If she feels that the first pound of potatoes is worth \(1.50, the second pound is worth \)1.14, the third pound is worth \(1.05, and all subsequent pounds are worth \)0.30 per pound, how many pounds of potatoes will she purchase? How many pounds will she purchase if she has only $2 to spend?

How does the slope of a budget line illustrate opportunity costs and trade-offs? How does a budget line illustrate scarcity and the effect of limited incomes?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free