Use the ideas of consumer surplus and producer surplus to explain why economists say competitive markets are efficient. Why are below- or above-equilibrium levels of output inefficient, according to these two ideas?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The competitive markets are efficient because the produced output level maximizes the consumer and producer surplus (total surplus).

Any point above and below the equilibrium output level reduces the amount of total surplus and thus is inefficient.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Meaning of consumer and producer surplus

Consumer surplus is the difference between the maximum price a consumer is willing to pay (based on his/her opportunity cost) and the actual market price he/she pays.

For example, if a consumer is willing to pay a maximum of $2 for good A, it means he/she can divert resources in buying this good up to a limit of $2 worth of other goods and resources. If the market price of the said good is $1, then the consumer surplus is $1 (=2-1).

Producer surplus is the difference between the market price of a good and the minimum price that a producer can accept to produce and sell that good.

For example, the production of a unit of good A costs $5. The producer will produce good A (and divert resources towards this production) if the lowest price he/she receives is $5 (break-even price). If the market price is $6, then the producer surplus is $1 (=$6-$5).

02

Step 2. Efficiency in the competitive markets

Consider the following diagram. The demand curve and supply curve intersect at point “e.” At this point, the willingness to pay matches the minimum acceptable price. The scarce resources are used to produce high-valued goods (allocative efficiency) using the best technology at the minimum cost possible (productive efficiency).

Thus, the larger number of buyers and sellers ensures a competitive market which results in an equilibrium output level that reflects the allocative and productive efficiency in the market. The total surplus (consumer surplus + producer surplus) given by the shaded region is maximum at this level.

At the equilibrium level, all the producers who can produce at a lower cost and buyers who value the good higher than the price are included, maximizing the total surplus.

03

Step 3. Inefficiency at below- or above- equilibrium output levels.

Let’s use the diagram given below to understand why only the equilibrium level is economically efficient:

At the Q1 level of output (<Q), the maximum willingness to pay consumers (demand curve) exceeds the minimum acceptable prices for sellers (supply curve). The benefit of producing an additional unit is more than the opportunity cost of resources used to produce that unit of a good. There is a possibility of utilizing this difference and increasing the producer surplus (total surplus) by increasing the output level.

Similarly, at the Q2 level, the minimum acceptable price for sellers exceeds the maximum willingness to pay off the consumers. The benefit of producing an additional unit is less than the opportunity cost of resources. Thus, to reduce the costs and maximize the consumer surplus (total surplus), the output should be decreased.

Thus, only at the Q level, where demand is equal to the supply, the total surplus is maximized. Any point above or below the equilibrium level creates differences in benefits and costs, leading to inefficiency in the market.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The LoJack car recovery system allows the police to track stolen cars. As a result, they not only recover 90 percent of LoJack-equipped cars that are stolen but also arrest many auto thieves and shut down many “chop shops” that rip apart stolen vehicles to get their parts. Thus, LoJack provides both private benefits and positive externalities. Should the government consider subsidizing LoJack purchases?

Consider a used-car market with asymmetric information. The owners of used cars know what their vehicles are worth but have no way of credibly demonstrating those values to potential buyers. Thus, potential buyers must always worry that the used car they are being offered may be a low-quality “lemon.”

  1. Suppose that there are equal numbers of good and bad used cars in the market. Good used cars are worth \(13,000, and bad used cars are worth \)5,000. What is the average value of a used car?
  2. By how much does the average value exceed the value of a bad used car? By how much does the value of a good used car exceed the average value?
  3. Would a potential seller of a good used car be willing to accept the average value as payment for the vehicle?
  4. If a buyer negotiates with a seller to purchase the seller’s used car for a price equal to the average value, is the car more likely to be good or bad?
  5. Will the used-car market come to feature mostly—if not exclusively—lemons? Explain. How much will used cars end up costing if all the good cars are withdrawn from the market?

An apple grower’s orchard provides nectar to a neighbor’s bees, while the beekeeper’s bees help the apple grower by pollinating his apple blossoms. Use Figure 4.5b to explain why this situation of dual positive externalities might lead to an underallocation of resources to both apple growing and beekeeping. How might this underallocation get resolved via the means suggested by the Coase theorem?

Match each of the following characteristics or scenarios with either the term negative externality or the term positive externality.

a. Resources are overallocated.

b. Tammy installs a very nice front garden, raising the property values ofall the other houses on her block.

c. Market demand curves are too far to the left (too low).

d. Resources are under-allocated.

e. Water pollution from a factory forces neighbors to buy a water purifier

People drive faster when they have auto insurance. This example illustrates

  1. adverse selection.
  2. asymmetric information.
  3. moral hazard.
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free