Consider a used-car market with asymmetric information. The owners of used cars know what their vehicles are worth but have no way of credibly demonstrating those values to potential buyers. Thus, potential buyers must always worry that the used car they are being offered may be a low-quality “lemon.”

  1. Suppose that there are equal numbers of good and bad used cars in the market. Good used cars are worth \(13,000, and bad used cars are worth \)5,000. What is the average value of a used car?
  2. By how much does the average value exceed the value of a bad used car? By how much does the value of a good used car exceed the average value?
  3. Would a potential seller of a good used car be willing to accept the average value as payment for the vehicle?
  4. If a buyer negotiates with a seller to purchase the seller’s used car for a price equal to the average value, is the car more likely to be good or bad?
  5. Will the used-car market come to feature mostly—if not exclusively—lemons? Explain. How much will used cars end up costing if all the good cars are withdrawn from the market?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The average value of a car is $9000.
  2. The average value exceeds a bad used car value by $4000, and the average value of a car is $4000 less than the value of a good used car.
  3. No, the seller will not accept the payment..
  4. The car is more likely to be bad.
  5. It will be filled with lemons due to a lower acceptable price for good used-car owners. The used cars will cost $5000 if the good cars are withdrawn.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. The explanation for part (a)

The average value in the used-car market is determined to reduce the risk of asymmetric information, which can lead to adverse selection. It is calculated by adding up the product of the probability of choosing a good with the value of a good car and the probability of choosing a bad car with the value of a bad car.

Thus, the average value of the used car given that there is an equal number of good cars worth $13,000 and bad cars worth $5,000 is given below:

AverageValue=Pg×Wg+Pb×Wb=12×13000+12×5000=9000

02

Step 2. The explanation for part (b)

The value of the bad car is $4000 less than the average value of a car in the used-car market (=$9000-$5000). Thus, the average value exceeds the bad car value by $4000. The value of a good car is $4000 more than the average value of a car in a used-car market (=$13000-$9000).

03

Step 3. The explanation for part (c)

The seller of a good used car knows the car’s worth and thus, would be unwilling to accept a lower payment value. Since the average value of a car in the used-car market is $4000 less than the true value of the good used car. The seller will not engage in any transaction.

04

Step 4. The explanation for part (d)

If a buyer is able to negotiate and convince a seller to sell his/her car at a price equal to the average value of the car ($9000), then the car is a bad used car. A well-used car owner will find the lower payment (compared to $13000) unacceptable, whereas a badly used car owner will be happy to get a higher price (compared to $5000).

05

Step 5. The explanation for part (e)

Since most good used-car owners will be unwilling to accept lower prices for their good cars, the market will be filled with lemons (bad used cars). The badly used car owners will be more than happy to sell their cars at the average value.

The withdrawal of good used cars will reduce the average value to $5000, which is the true value of a bad used car.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Because medical records are private, an individual applying for health insurance will know more about his own health conditions than will the insurance companies to which he is applying for coverage. Is this information asymmetry likely to increase or decrease the insurance premium? Why?

What information does a government need if it wants to attempt to reduce a widespread negative externality like air pollution? Who, typically, is actually in possession of that information? How do markets in tradable emissions permits solve the asymmetric information problem affecting pollution abatement efforts?

Assume the following values for Figures 4.4a and 4.4b: Q1 = 20 bags; Q2 = 15 bags; Q3 = 27 bags. The market equilibrium price is \(45 per bag. The price at a is \)85 per bag. The price at c is \(5 per bag. The price at f is \)59 per bag. The price at g is $31 per bag. Apply the formula for the area of a triangle (Area = ½ × Base × Height) to answer the following questions.

a. What is the dollar value of the total surplus (= producer surplus + consumer surplus) when the allocatively efficient output level is produced? What is the dollar value of the consumer surplus at that output level?

b. What is the dollar value of the deadweight loss when output level Q2 is produced? What is the total surplus when output level Q2 is produced?

c. What is the dollar value of the deadweight loss when output level Q3 is produced?

Explain why zoning laws, which allow certain land uses only in specific locations, might be justified in dealing with negative externalities. Explain why in areas where buildings sit close together, tax breaks to property owners for installing extra fire-prevention equipment might be justified due to positive externalities.

Assume that candle wax is traded in a perfectly competitive market in which the demand curve captures buyers’ full willingness to pay while the supply curve reflects all production costs. For each of the following situations, indicate whether the total output should be increased, decreased, or kept the same in order to achieve allocative and productive efficiency:

  1. Maximum willingness to pay exceeds the minimum acceptable price.
  2. MC > MB.
  3. Total surplus is at a maximum.
  4. The current quantity produced exceeds the market equilibrium quantity.
See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free