True or False: A market may collapse and have relatively few transactions between buyers and sellers if buyers have more information than sellers.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The statement “A market may collapse and have relatively few transactions between buyers and sellers if buyers have more information than sellers” is false.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Effect of asymmetric information 

Asymmetric information is a problem of insufficient information to make an informed decision in a market. Here, one party suffers due to a lack of information that the other party (seller) possesses.

For example, a second-hand car buyer does not have the information that the owner/seller of the second-hand cars possesses. A buyer may end up buying a lemon/bad used car.

The said lack of information increases the risk of choosing a “bad” good or service. Due to this, the buyer’s demand falls short of what would have been in case there was no asymmetry or more information. Hence, the scarce resources are inefficiently allocated.

02

Step 2. Effect on the market if buyers have more information than sellers

If buyers have more information than sellers, they will be able to make better-informed decisions. There will be lower or no risk associated with purchasing a good or service; hence, the demand will be higher. The sellers will sell the goods to the buyers who value their goods the most, and producers will do production at the lowest cost possible.

Thus, there will be both allocative and productive efficiency, with no wastage of resources. The transactions will be relatively higher, and the total surplus will be maximum. The market will not collapse.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume that candle wax is traded in a perfectly competitive market in which the demand curve captures buyers’ full willingness to pay while the supply curve reflects all production costs. For each of the following situations, indicate whether the total output should be increased, decreased, or kept the same in order to achieve allocative and productive efficiency:

  1. Maximum willingness to pay exceeds the minimum acceptable price.
  2. MC > MB.
  3. Total surplus is at a maximum.
  4. The current quantity produced exceeds the market equilibrium quantity.

Use marginal cost-marginal benefit analysis to determine if the following statement is true or false: “The optimal amount of pollution abatement for some substances, say dirty water from storm drains, is very low; the optimal amount of abatement for other substances, say cyanide poison, is close to 100 percent.”

Explain why zoning laws, which allow certain land uses only in specific locations, might be justified in dealing with negative externalities. Explain why in areas where buildings sit close together, tax breaks to property owners for installing extra fire-prevention equipment might be justified due to positive externalities.

Match each of the following characteristics or scenarios with either the term negative externality or the term positive externality.

a. Resources are overallocated.

b. Tammy installs a very nice front garden, raising the property values ofall the other houses on her block.

c. Market demand curves are too far to the left (too low).

d. Resources are under-allocated.

e. Water pollution from a factory forces neighbors to buy a water purifier

Use the ideas of consumer surplus and producer surplus to explain why economists say competitive markets are efficient. Why are below- or above-equilibrium levels of output inefficient, according to these two ideas?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free