Political advertising is often directed at winning over so-called swing voters, whose votes might go either way. Suppose that two political parties—the Freedom Party and the Liberty Party—disagree on whether to build a new road. Polling shows that of 1,000 total voters, 450 are firmly for the new road and 450 are firmly against the new road. Thus, each party will try to win over a majority of the 100 remaining swing voters.

a. Suppose that each party spends $5,000 on untargeted TV, radio, and newspaper ads that are equally likely to reach any and all voters. How much per voter will be spent by both parties combined?

b. Suppose that, instead, each party could direct all of its spending toward just the swing voters by using targeted social media ads. If all of the two parties’ combined spending is targeted at just swing voters, how much will be spent per swing voter?

c. Suppose that only the Freedom Party knows how to target voters using social media. How much per swing voter will it be spending? If at the same time the Liberty Party is still using only untargeted TV, radio, and newspaper ads, what portion of its total spending is likely to be reaching the 100, swing voters? How much per swing voter does that portion amount to?

d. Looking at your answers to part c, how much more per swing voter will the Freedom Party be spending than the Liberty Party? If spending per swing voter influences elections, which party is more likely to win?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The combined spending on advertising per voter is $10.

  2. The combined spending on social media advertising per swing voter is $100.

  3. Freedom party’s spending per swing voter is $50.10% of the total spending of Liberty Party is likely to reach 100 swing voters. Spending per swing voter is $5.

  4. Freedom Party spends $45 more than Liberty Party on an average swing voter.

The freedom party is more likely to win

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The combined spending per voter is calculated by dividing the total cost of untargeted advertising meant to influence all the voters by the total number of voters. This is calculated below:Combinedspendingpervoter=SpendingofLibertyParty+SpendingofFreedomPartyTotalNumberofVoters=5000+50001000=$10

Thus, combined spending per voter is $10.

02

Explanation for part (b)

The combined spending per swing voter is calculated by dividing the total cost of targeted social media advertising meant to influence the swing voters by the total number of swing voters.This is calculated below:Combinedspendingperswingvoter=Spendingoflibertyparty+SpendingoffreedompartyTotalnumberofswingvoters=5000+5000100=$100

Thus, combined spending per swing voter is $100.

03

Explanation for part (c)

Freedom party’s spending per swing voter is calculated by dividing their cost of targeted social media advertising meant to influence the swing voters by the total number of swing voters. This is calculated below:Spendingperswingvoter=TotalspendingontargetedadsbyfreedompartyTotalnumberofswingvoters=5000100=$50

If the Liberty party is still using untargeted ads, it is spending a total of $5000. It's spending per voter, whether they are a swing voter or not, is $5, as shown below.Spendingpervoter=SpendingoflibertypartyTotalnumberofvoters=50001000=$5

Liberty Party’s total spending on 100 swing voters will be $500, calculated as follows:

10 % of the total spending of the Liberty Party ($5000) is spent on swing voters, which is $500.

The spending per swing voter will be $5, as shown below:Spendingperswingvoter=PortionoftotalspendingoflibertypartyonswingvotersTotalnumberofswingvoters=500100=$5

04

Explanation for part (d)

Freedom party’s spending per swing voter is $45 (=$50-$5) more than the Liberty Party. If spending on swing voters affects the elections, the Freedom party is more likely to win the election as it spends $50 per swing voter compared to Liberty Party’s spending of $5 per swing voter.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

True or False: The median-voter model explains why politicians so often stake out fringe positions that appeal only to a small segment of the electorate.

“Majority voting ensures that government will produce only those public goods for which benefits exceed costs.” Discuss.

Look back at Figures 5.2a and 5.2b, which show the costs and benefits to voters Garcia, Johnson, and Lee of two different public goods that the government will produce if a majority of voters support them. Suppose that Garcia, Johnson, and Lee have decided to have one single vote at which the funding for both of those public goods will be decided simultaneously.

a. Given the $300 cost per person of each public good, what are Garcia’s net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will she vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously?

b. What are Lee’s net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will she vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously?

c. What are Johnson’s net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will he vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously—or will he be indifferent?

d. Who is the median voter here? Whom will the two other voters be attempting to persuade?

What are the pluses and minuses of corporate location subsidies? Why do politicians like them so much? Would you be surprised to know that many of the 238 cities bidding for Amazon's HQ2 offered much larger location subsidies than did New York City and Alexandria, Virginia? Explain.

Use the distinction between the characteristics of private goods and public goods to determine whether the following should be produced through the market system or provided by government: (a) French fries, (b) airport screening, (c) court systems, (d) mail delivery, and (e) medical care. Explain your answers.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free