Consider a specific example of the special-interest effect and the collective-action problem. In 2012, it was estimated that the total value of all corn-production subsidies in the United States was about \(3 billion. The population of the United States was approximately 300 million people that year.

a. On average, how much did corn subsidies cost per person in the United States in 2012? (Hint: A billion is a 1 followed by nine zeros. A million is a 1 followed by six zeros.)

b. If each person in the United States is willing to spend only \)0.50 to support efforts to overturn the corn subsidy, and if anti-subsidy advocates can only raise funds from 10 percent of the population, how much money will they be able to raise for their lobbying efforts?

c. If the recipients of corn subsidies donate just 1 percent of the total amount that they receive in subsidies, how much could they raise to support lobbying efforts to continue the corn subsidy?

d. By how many dollars does the amount raised by the recipients of the corn subsidy exceed the amount raised by the opponents of the corn subsidy?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The cost of corn subsidies per person is $10.

  2. The total money raised for lobbying efforts against the corn subsidy provision is $15million.

  3. The money raised for lobbying efforts favoring corn subsidy provision is $30 million.

  4. Lobbying fund amount raised by recipients exceeds the amount raised by opponents of corn subsidy by $15 million.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The average amount of corn subsidies are calculated by finding the ratio of total subsides by the population size. Thus, with a population of 300 million people and $3 billion of total corn-production subsidies, the cost of corn subsidies per person would be $10, as shown below:Cornsubsidiesperperson=TotalcornsubsidiesTotalpop[ulation=3,000,000,000300,000,000=$10

02

Explanation for part (b)

The total money raised for anti-subsidy lobbying activities/efforts is calculated by finding the product of the willingness to spend per person to over-turn corn subsidy policy and the portion of the population that supports anti-subsidy policy or lobbying efforts, as shown below:Totalfunds=Moneyraisedfromasingleperson×Totalpeoplewhogavemoney=0.50×10%of300million=0.50×0.10×300,000,000=$15,000,000

Thus, the total money raised by opponents to stop corn-production subsidies and to fund the respective lobbying efforts is $15 million.

03

Explanation for part (c)

The total money raised for lobbying activities/efforts in favor of providing subsidies is one percent of the total subsidies received by the recipients.Totalfunds=1%of3billion=0.01×3,000,000,000=$30,000,000

Thus, the total money raised by recipients to continue the corn-production subsidies and to fund the respective lobbying efforts is $30 million.

04

Explanation for part (d)

The recipients of corn subsidies raised $30 million funds, whereas the opponents of the corn subsidy raised $ 15 million. Thus, the recipients raised $15 million more than the opponents (=30-15).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

True or False: The median-voter model explains why politicians so often stake out fringe positions that appeal only to a small segment of the electorate.

Look back at Figures 5.2a and 5.2b, which show the costs and benefits to voters Garcia, Johnson, and Lee of two different public goods that the government will produce if a majority of voters support them. Suppose that Garcia, Johnson, and Lee have decided to have one single vote at which the funding for both of those public goods will be decided simultaneously.

a. Given the $300 cost per person of each public good, what are Garcia’s net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will she vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously?

b. What are Lee’s net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will she vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously?

c. What are Johnson’s net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will he vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously—or will he be indifferent?

d. Who is the median voter here? Whom will the two other voters be attempting to persuade?

Use your demand schedule for the public good, determined in problem 1, and the following supply schedule to ascertain the optimal quantity of this public good.

Price (\()
Qd
191
162
133
104
75
46
27
18
Price (\))Qs
1910
168
136
104
72
41
2-
1-

Draw a production possibilities curve with public goods on the vertical axis and private goods on the horizontal axis. Assuming the economy is initially operating on the curve, indicate how the production of public goods might be increased. How might the output of public goods be increased if the economy is initially operating at a point inside the curve?

Use the distinction between the characteristics of private goods and public goods to determine whether the following should be produced through the market system or provided by government: (a) French fries, (b) airport screening, (c) court systems, (d) mail delivery, and (e) medical care. Explain your answers.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free