What is rent-seeking, and how does it differ from the kinds of profit maximization and profit-seeking that we discussed in previous chapters? Provide an actual or hypothetical example of rent seeking by firms in an industry, by a union, or by a professional association (for example, physicians, school teachers, or lawyers). Why do elected officials often accommodate rent-seeking behavior, particularly by special-interest groups located in their home states?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Rent-seeking is a method to increase profit beyond what is actually required as payment of the resources or services at the expense of others. It is different from profit maximization and profit-seeking because, in profit maximization, the producer maximizes his profit through market forces.

A law requiring $500 for solar panel installation certification from a private regulatory company would be an example of benefiting the company through rent-seeking.

The elected officials accommodate rent-seeking because they want support for the next elections.

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of rent-seeking and profit maximization

Rent-seeking is a strategy to gain additional profit or income beyond the minimum payment required to keep running the resources at someone else's expense. In rent-seeking, the rent seeker looks to increase its income for a resource it provides by shifting the burden of cost to others. Rent-seeking is possible only through government help.

For instance, suppose a businessman is making money through a dance club running in a locality but creates a lot of noise pollution the whole night because he does not pay any taxes. He is maximizing his profit at the cost of social welfare, which is borne by society. It is rent-seeking behavior.

Rent-seeking is different from other profit maximization techniques. In those techniques, the entrepreneur tries to maximize their profit by adjusting their output and prices, increasing production efficiency, technology, and production quality. Profit maximization techniques work according to market ethics, while rent-seeking looks up to the government's influence.

02

Understanding rent-seeking through example

Suppose a concerned department for environment protection in the government passes a law that requires companies to install solar panels in an area to reduce the wastage of electricity during summers. The law requires that these solar panels be certified by a private regulatory authority that charges $500 for this. The head of the firm belongs to a very influential family.

This amount is unnecessary but made compulsory by the law. This is rent-seeking.

03

Elected officials accommodating the rent-seeking behavior

In the above example, the elected officials made a law to benefit the private regulatory authority. The idea is to gain support from the people as it seems like an environmental protection plan and at the same time helps a company earn income.

The elected officials' main agenda behind rent-seeking behavior is to be re-elected in the upcoming elections. Therefore, they find out how the special interest can help them win over the next elections.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a specific example of the special-interest effect and the collective-action problem. In 2012, it was estimated that the total value of all corn-production subsidies in the United States was about \(3 billion. The population of the United States was approximately 300 million people that year.

a. On average, how much did corn subsidies cost per person in the United States in 2012? (Hint: A billion is a 1 followed by nine zeros. A million is a 1 followed by six zeros.)

b. If each person in the United States is willing to spend only \)0.50 to support efforts to overturn the corn subsidy, and if anti-subsidy advocates can only raise funds from 10 percent of the population, how much money will they be able to raise for their lobbying efforts?

c. If the recipients of corn subsidies donate just 1 percent of the total amount that they receive in subsidies, how much could they raise to support lobbying efforts to continue the corn subsidy?

d. By how many dollars does the amount raised by the recipients of the corn subsidy exceed the amount raised by the opponents of the corn subsidy?

What are the pluses and minuses of corporate location subsidies? Why do politicians like them so much? Would you be surprised to know that many of the 238 cities bidding for Amazon's HQ2 offered much larger location subsidies than did New York City and Alexandria, Virginia? Explain.

We can apply voting paradoxes to the highway construction example of Table 5.2. Suppose there are only five people in a society, and each favors one of the five highway construction options listed in Table 5.2 (“No new construction” is one of the five options). Explain which of these highway options will be selected using a majority paired-choice vote. Will this option be the optimal size of the project from an economic perspective?

Plan
Total cost of project (\()
Marginal cost (\))
Total Benefit
Marginal Benefit
Net Benefit (TB-TC)
No new construction
0-0--
A: Widen existing highways
5050200200150
B: New 2-lane highways
14090350150210
C: New 4-lane highways
240100470120230
D: New 6-lane highways
620380580110-40

What are the two characteristics of public goods? Explain the significance of each for public provision as opposed to private provision. What is the free-rider problem as it relates to public goods? Is US border patrol a public good or a private good? Why? What type of good is a satellite TV? Explain.

Consider a corrupt provincial government in which each housing inspector examines two newly built structures each week. All the builders in the province are unethical and want to increase their profits by using substandard construction materials, but they can’t do that unless they can bribe a housing inspector into approving a substandard building.

a. If bribes cost \(1,000 each, how much will a housing inspector make each year in bribes? (Assume that each inspector works 52 weeks a year and gets bribed for every house he or she inspects.)

b. There is a provincial construction supervisor who gets to hire all of the housing inspectors. He himself is corrupt and expects his housing inspectors to share their bribes with him. Suppose that 20 inspectors work for him and that each passes along half the bribes collected from builders. How much will the construction supervisor collect each year?

c. Corrupt officials may have an incentive to reduce the provision of government services to help line their own pockets. Suppose that the provincial construction supervisor decides to cut the total number of housing inspectors from 20 to 10 in order to decrease the supply of new housing permits. This decrease in the supply of permits raises the equilibrium bribe from \)1,000 to \(2,500. How much per year will the construction supervisor now receive if he is still getting half of all the bribes collected by the 10 inspectors? How much more is the construction supervisor getting now than when he had 20 inspectors working in part b? Will he personally be happy with the reduction in government services?

d. What would happen if reducing the number of inspectors from 20 to 10 only increased the equilibrium bribe from \)1,000 to $1,500? In this case, how much per year would the construction supervisor collect from his 10 inspectors? How much less is the construction supervisor getting than when he had 20 inspectors working in part b? In this case, will the construction supervisor be happy with the reduction in government services? Will he want to go back to using 20 inspectors?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free