Refer to the accompanying table in answering the questions that follow:

(1) Possible Levels of Employment, Millions

(2) Real Domestic Output, Millions

(3) Aggregate Expenditures (Ca + Ig+ Xn+ G), Millions

90

\(500

\)520

100

550

560

110

600

600

120

650

640

130

700

680

  1. If full employment in this economy is 130 million, will there be an inflationary expenditure gap or a recessionary expenditure gap? What will be the consequence of this gap? By how much would aggregate expenditures in column 3 have to change at each level of GDP to eliminate the inflationary expenditure gap or the recessionary expenditure gap? What is the multiplier in this example?

  2. Will there be an inflationary expenditure gap or a recessionary expenditure gap if the full employment level of output is $500 billion? By how much would aggregate expenditures in column 3 have to change at each level of GDP to eliminate the gap? What is the multiplier in this example?

  3. Assuming that investment, net exports, and government expenditures do not change with changes in real GDP, what are the values of the MPC, the MPS, and the multiplier?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. There will be a recessionary expenditure gap in the economy at full employment of 130 million. The recessionary gap will lead to unemployment and a decline in output.

  2. The economy will raise its total spending by $36 billion at each level of GDP to eliminate the recessionary expenditure gap. It will produce a multiplier effect of 1.389. The economy will face an inflationary expenditure gap at $500 billion potential GDP. The economy will have to diminish its total spending by $36 billion at each level of GDP to eliminate the inflationary expenditure gap with the multiplier effect of 1.389.

  3. The MPC, MPS, and multiplier values are 0.8, 0.2, and 1.25, respectively.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Expenditure gap, consequences, recovery rate, and multiplier at 130 million full employment level

The expenditure gap arises when the actual GDP deviates from the full employment level GDP.

Actual GDP > Full Employment GDP: Inflationary expenditure gap

Actual GDP < Full employment GDP: Recessionary expenditure gap

The actual equilibrium level of GDP is $600 billion (Real GDP=Aggregate expenditure). This level of GDP falls short of the potential GDP level of $700 billion (given by the full employment level of 130 million) by $100 billion. Therefore, the economy will go through a recessionary expenditure gap. At $700 billion in GDP, the expenditure is $680 billion, and there is a gap of $20 billion, which is a recessionary gap.

The consequences of this recessionary expenditure gap will be reduced consumer demand and investments and increased unemployment levels. This will reduce the economy's output, which in turn will reduce the consumer demand and investment further, creating a more severe recession.

The economy has to increase its total spending to cover the recessionary gap of $20 billion at each level of GDP.

An improvement of $40 billion in total expenditure will produce an appraisal of $50 billion in the GDP. Therefore, the MPC will be 0.8 (= 40/50).

Thus, the multiplier for the economy is as follows:

k=11-MPSk=11-0.8k=5

Hence, the multiplier is 5.

02

Step 2. Expenditure gap, recovery rate, and multiplier value at $700 billion of full employment level of GDP

The excess aggregate expenditure beyond the full employment level causes an inflationary expenditure gap. The equilibrium GDP is $600 billion. Thus, the economy will experience an inflationary expenditure gap at $500 billion of full employment GDP.

The maximum total spending received by the economy at full employment of $500 billion is $520 billion, and the economy has to reduce it to $500 billion. Thus, the economy must eliminate $20 billion (=520–500) to remove the inflationary gap.

Since the change in aggregate expenditure and GDP is constant, the multiplier is constant at 5.

03

Step 3. MPC, MPS, and multiplier at given levels of GDP and total spending

Since the investment, government expenditure, and net exports are constant, the only variable component in the aggregate expenditure is consumption.

Consumption is constantly increasing by $40 billion while income is growing by $50 billion.

MPC=ConsumptionIncomeMPC=4050MPC=0.8

The MPC is 0.8.

According to the relationship between MPC and MPS,

MPS = 1 – MPC.

MPS = 1 – 0.8

MPS = 0.2

Hence, MPS is 0.2.

The following formula helps to find the multiplier size:

k=1MPSk=10.2k=5

Thus, the multiplier is 5.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The economy’s current level of equilibrium GDP is \(780 billion. The full-employment level of GDP is \)800 billion. The multiplier is 4. Given those facts, we know that the economy faces _______ expenditure gap of ___________.

  1. an inflationary; \(5 billion

  2. an inflationary; \)10 billion

  3. an inflationary; \(20 billion

  4. a recessionary; \)5 billion

  5. a recessionary; \(10 billion

  6. a recessionary; \)20 billion

Depict graphically the aggregate expenditures model for a private closed economy. Now show a decrease in the aggregate expenditures schedule and explain why the decline in real GDP in your diagram is greater than the decline in the aggregate expenditures schedule. What term is used for the ratio of a decline in real GDP to the initial drop in aggregate expenditures?

Other things equal, what effect will each of the following changes independently have on the equilibrium level of real GDP in a private closed economy?

  1. A decline in the real interest rate.

  2. An overall decrease in the expected rate of return on investment.

  3. A sizable, sustained increase in stock prices.

Assume that the consumption schedule for a private open economy is such that consumption C = 50 + 0.8Y. Assume further that planned investment Ig and net exports Xn are independent of the level of real GDP and constant at Ig = 30 and Xn = 10. Recall also that, in equilibrium, the real output produced (Y) is equal to aggregate expenditures: Y = C + Ig + Xn.

  1. Calculate the equilibrium level of income or real GDP for this economy.

  2. What happens to equilibrium Y if Ig changes to 10? What does this outcome reveal about the size of the multiplier?

Using the consumption and saving data in problem 1 and assuming investment is \(16 billion, what are saving and planned investment at the \)380 billion level of domestic output? What are saving and actual investment at that level? What are saving and planned investments at the \(300 billion level of domestic output? What are the levels of saving and actual investment? In which direction and by what amount will unplanned investment change as the economy moves from the \)380 billion level of GDP to the equilibrium level of real GDP? From the \(300 billion level of real GDP to the equilibrium level of GDP?

Possible Levels of Employment, Millions

Real Domestic Output (GDP = DI), Billions

Consumption, Billions

Saving, Billions (DI – C)

40

\)240

\(244

-\)4

45

260

260

0

50

280

276

4

55

300

292

8

60

320

308

12

65

340

324

16

70

360

340

20

75

380

356

24

80

400

372

28

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free