The development of optimal tax policy has been a major topic in public finance for centuries. \(^{17}\) Probably the most famous result in the theory of optimal taxation is due to the English economist Frank Ramsey, who conceptualized the problem as how to structure a tax system that would collect a given amount of revenues with the minimal deadweight loss. \(^{18}\) Specifically, suppose there are \(n\) goods \(\left(x_{i} \text { with prices } p_{i}\right)\) to be taxed with a sequence of ad valorem taxes (see Problem 12.10 ) whose rates are given by \(t_{i}(i=1, n) .\) Therefore, total tax revenue is given by \(T=\sum_{i=1}^{n} t_{i} p_{i} x_{i} .\) Ramsey's problem is for a fixed \(T\) to choose tax rates that will minimize total deadweight loss \(D W=\sum_{i=1}^{n} D W\left(t_{i}\right)\) a. Use the Lagrange multiplier method to show that the solution to Ramsey's problem requires \(t_{i}=\lambda\left(1 / e_{s}-1 / e_{\mathrm{D}}\right),\) where \(\lambda\) is the Lagrange multiplier for the tax constraint. b. Interpret the Ramsey result intuitively. c. Describe some shortcomings of the Ramsey approach to optimal taxation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The optimal tax rates for each good (t_i) should be proportional to the difference between the reciprocals of the supply and demand elasticities. Goods with a low elasticity of demand and/or high elasticity of supply should have a higher tax rate in order to minimize the deadweight loss.

Step by step solution

01

1. Objective Function

The first step is to set up the objective function for the Ramsey problem: \( Minimize: DW = \sum_{i=1}^{n}DW(t_i)\) \( Subject \ to: T = \sum_{i=1}^{n}t_ip_ix_i\), where \(DW\) is the total deadweight loss, \(t_i\) is the tax rate for good i, \(p_i\) is the price for good i, \(x_i\) is the quantity of good i, and \(T\) is the total tax revenue.
02

2. Lagrange Multiplier Method

The Lagrange multiplier method can be used to minimize deadweight loss subject to the tax revenue constraint: \(L = \sum_{i=1}^{n} DW(t_i) + \lambda \left( T - \sum_{i=1}^{n} t_ip_ix_i \right)\), where \(\lambda\) is the Lagrange multiplier. Differentiate L with respect to \(t_i\): \(\frac{dL}{dt_i} = \frac{dDW(t_i)}{dt_i} - \lambda p_ix_i = 0\) Now, isolate \(t_i\): \(t_i = \lambda \left(\frac{1}{e_S} - \frac{1}{e_D}\right)\), where \(e_S\) and \(e_D\) are the elasticity of supply and demand, respectively.
03

3. Interpretation of the Ramsey result

The Ramsey result can be interpreted as follows: the optimal tax rates for each good (\(t_i\)) are proportional to the difference between the reciprocals of the supply and demand elasticities. Goods with a low elasticity of demand and/or high elasticity of supply should have a higher tax rate in order to minimize the deadweight loss.
04

4. Shortcomings of the Ramsey approach

There are several shortcomings of the Ramsey approach to optimal taxation: 1. It does not address equity concerns, i.e., it does not consider the distribution of income or welfare among individuals. 2. It assumes that there is perfect competition in the market, and therefore does not account for market imperfections or distortions. 3. It may not be possible to accurately measure the elasticity of supply and demand for all goods in the economy, which would make it challenging to implement the Ramsey tax rates in practice. 4. The Ramsey result is based on ad valorem taxes, which may not be applicable to other forms of taxation such as income, consumption, or property taxes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The handmade snuffbox industry is composed of 100 identical firms, each having short-run total costs given by \\[ S T C=0.5 q^{2}+10 q+5 \\] and short-run marginal costs given by \\[ S M C=q+10 \\] where \(q\) is the output of snuffboxes per day. a. What is the short-run supply curve for each snuffbox maker? What is the short-run supply curve for the market as a whole? b. Suppose the demand for total snuffbox production is given by \\[ Q=1,100-50 P \\] What will be the equilibrium in this marketplace? What will each firm's total short-run profits be? c. Graph the market equilibrium and compute total short-run producer surplus in this case. d. Show that the total producer surplus you calculated in part (c) is equal to total industry profits plus industry short-run fixed costs. e. Suppose the government imposed a \(\$ 3\) tax on snuffboxes. How would this tax change the market equilibrium? f. How would the burden of this tax be shared between snuffbox buyers and sellers? g. Calculate the total loss of producer surplus as a result of the taxation of snuffboxes. Show that this loss equals the change in total short-run profits in the snuffbox industry. Why do fixed costs not enter into this computation of the change in short-run producer surplus?

demand is given by \\[ Q=1,500-50 P \\] a. What is the industry's long-run supply schedule? b. What is the long-run equilibrium price \(\left(P^{*}\right) ?\) The total industry output \(\left(Q^{*}\right) ?\) The output of each firm \(\left(q^{*}\right) ?\) The number of firms? The profits of each firm? c. The short-run total cost function associated with each firm's long-run equilibrium output is given by \\[ C(q)=0.5 q^{2}-10 q+200 \\] Calculate the short-run average and marginal cost function. At what output level does short-run average cost reach a minimum? d. Calculate the short-run supply function for each firm and the industry short-run supply function. e. Suppose now that the market demand function shifts upward to \(Q=2,000-50 P .\) Using this new demand curve, answer part (b) for the very short run when firms cannot change their outputs. f. In the short run, use the industry short-run supply function to recalculate the answers to (b). g. What is the new long-run equilibrium for the industry?

A perfectly competitive market has 1,000 firms. In the very short run, each of the firms has a fixed supply of 100 units. The market demand is given by \\[ Q=160,000-10,000 P \\] a. Calculate the equilibrium price in the very short run. b. Calculate the demand schedule facing any one firm in this industry. c. Calculate what the equilibrium price would be if one of the sellers decided to sell nothing or if one seller decided to sell 200 units. d. At the original equilibrium point, calculate the elasticity of the industry demand curve and the elasticity of the demand curve facing any one seller. Suppose now that, in the short run, each firm has a supply curve that shows the quantity the firm will supply \(\left(q_{i}\right)\) as a function of market price. The specific form of this supply curve is given by \\[ q_{i}=-200+50 P \\] Using this short-run supply response, supply revised answers to (a)-(d).

The perfectly competitive videotape-copying industry is composed of many firms that can copy five tapes per day at an average cost of \(\$ 10\) per tape. Each firm must also pay a royalty to film studios, and the per-film royalty rate \((r)\) is an increasing function of total industry output (Q): \\[ r=0.002 Q \\] Demand is given by \\[ Q=1,050-50 P \\] a. Assuming the industry is in long-run equilibrium, what will be the equilibrium price and quantity of copied tapes? How many tape firms will there be? What will the per-film royalty rate be? b. Suppose that demand for copied tapes increases to \\[ Q=1,600-50 P \\] In this case, what is the long-run equilibrium price and quantity for copied tapes? How many tape firms are there? What is the per-film royalty rate? c. Graph these long-run equilibria in the tape market, and calculate the increase in producer surplus between the situations described in parts (a) and (b). d. Show that the increase in producer surplus is precisely equal to the increase in royalties paid as \(Q\) expands incrementally from its level in part (b) to its level in part (c). e. Suppose that the government institutes a \(\$ 5.50\) per-film tax on the film-copying industry. Assuming that the demand for copied films is that given in part (a), how will this tax affect the market equilibrium? f. How will the burden of this tax be allocated between consumers and producers? What will be the loss of consumer and producer surplus? g. Show that the loss of producer surplus as a result of this tax is borne completely by the film studios. Explain your result intuitively.

Suppose there are 1,000 identical firms producing diamonds. Let the total cost function for each firm be given by \\[ C(q, w)=q^{2}+w q \\] where \(q\) is the firm's output level and \(w\) is the wage rate of diamond cutters. a. If \(w=10\), what will be the firm's (short-run) supply curve? What is the industry's supply curve? How many diamonds will be produced at a price of 20 each? How many more diamonds would be produced at a price of \(21 ?\) b. Suppose the wages of diamond cutters depend on the total quantity of diamonds produced, and suppose the form of this relationship is given by \\[ w=0.002 Q \\] here \(Q\) represents total industry output, which is 1,000 times the output of the typical firm. In this situation, show that the firm's marginal cost (and short-run supply) curve depends on \(Q\). What is the industry supply curve? How much will be produced at a price of \(20 ?\) How much more will be produced at a price of \(21 ?\) What do you conclude about the shape of the short-run supply curve?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free