Consider the following constrained maximization problem: \\[ \begin{array}{ll} \text { maximize } & y=x_{1}+5 \ln x_{2} \\ \text { subject to } & k-x_{1}-x_{2}=0 \end{array} \\] where \(k\) is a constant that can be assigned any specific value. a. Show that if \(k=10\), this problem can be solved as one involving only equality constraints. b. Show that solving this problem for \(k=4\) requires that \(x_{1}=-1\) c. If the \(x^{\prime}\) s in this problem must be non-negative, what is the optimal solution when \(k=4 ?\) (This problem may be solved either intuitively or using the methods outlined in the chapter.) d. What is the solution for this problem when \(k=20 ?\) What do you conclude by comparing this solution with the solution for part (a)? Note: This problem involves what is called a quasi-linear function. Such functions provide important examples of some types of behavior in consumer theory-as we shall see.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the provided step-by-step solution, provide a short answer discussing the results for the different values of k: When k = 10, the optimal solution is x1 = 5 and x2 = 5. When k = 4, the optimal solution cannot be found as there's no feasible solution, since x1 must be equal to -1, which is not possible under non-negativity constraint. When k = 20, the optimal solution is x1 = 15 and x2 = 5. From these results, it is observed that increasing the value of k causes an increase in the optimal value of x1 while leaving the optimal value of x2 unchanged, which indicates that the constraint is relatively more binding on x2, and x1 responds to the changes in k.

Step by step solution

01

Write down the Lagrangian function

To begin with, let's write down the Lagrangian function: \\[ L(x_{1}, x_{2}, \lambda) = x_{1} + 5 \ln{x_{2}} + \lambda (k - x_{1} - x_{2}) \\] The Lagrangian function L is the objective function plus the constraint multiplied by a Lagrange multiplier λ.
02

Find the first order conditions (FOC)

Now, we will differentiate the Lagrangian function with respect to x1 and x2 to obtain the FOC equations: \\[ \frac{\partial L(x_{1}, x_{2}, \lambda)}{\partial x_{1}} = 1 - \lambda \\] \\[ \frac{\partial L(x_{1}, x_{2}, \lambda)}{\partial x_{2}} = \frac{5}{x_{2}} - \lambda \\]
03

Solve the FOC equations and the constraint

We'll use the constraint equation k - x1 - x2 = 0 to eliminate x2 and substitute it into the second FOC equation: \\[ x_{2} = k - x_{1} \\] Now, substitute this into the second FOC equation: \\[ \frac{5}{k - x_{1}} - \lambda = 0 \\] At this point, we see that the two FOC equations are λ = 1 and λ = 5/(k-x1). We can equate these two expressions for λ and solve for x1: \\[ 1 = \frac{5}{k - x_{1}} \\] \\[ x_{1} = k - 5 \\] Now, we can plug this back into the constraint equation to find the optimal value for x2: \\[ k - 5 - x_{2} = 0 \\] \\[ x_{2} = k - 5 \\] So, the optimal solution is x1 = k - 5 and x2 = 5.
04

Find the optimal values of x1 and x2 for different values of k and discuss the results

Now, let's find the optimal values of x1 and x2 for k = 10, 4, and 20: a. For k = 10, x1 = 5 and x2 = 5. This problem can be solved as one involving only equality constraints. b. For k = 4, x1 = -1 and x2 = 5. To satisfy the constraint k = 4, x1 must be equal to -1. c. When x's are non-negative, the optimal solution for k = 4 can't be found because there is no feasible solution. One possible remedy would be to impose an additional constraint specifying non-negativity. d. For k = 20, x1 = 15 and x2 = 5. By comparing this solution with the solution when k = 10, we can observe that increasing the value of k causes an increase in the optimal value of x1 while leaving the optimal value of x2 unchanged. This tells us that the constraint is relatively more binding on x2, and x1 responds to the changes in k.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Lagrangian Function
At the heart of many economic optimization problems lies the Lagrangian function, a fundamental tool in constrained optimization. It allows us to transform a constrained problem into an unconstrained one by introducing a new variable, the Lagrange multiplier. To construct the Lagrangian function, we combine our objective function—in this case, maximizing output, given by \( y=x_{1}+5 \ln x_{2} \)—with the constraint \( k-x_{1}-x_{2}=0 \), multiplied by the Lagrange multiplier, \( \lambda \).

The resulting Lagrangian function for our exercise is:
\[ L(x_{1}, x_{2}, \lambda) = x_{1} + 5 \ln{x_{2}} + \lambda (k - x_{1} - x_{2}) \]
This function is then used to find the values of \( x_1 \), \( x_2 \), and \( \lambda \) that maximize the original function, while respecting the given constraint.
First Order Conditions (FOC)
The First Order Conditions, or FOCs, are critical to finding the optimum values in a constrained optimization problem. These conditions require setting the partial derivatives of the Lagrangian function with respect to each variable equal to zero.

For our problem, we calculate the derivatives with respect to \( x_1 \) and \( x_2 \):
\[ \frac{\partial L(x_{1}, x_{2}, \lambda)}{\partial x_{1}} = 1 - \lambda \]
\[ \frac{\partial L(x_{1}, x_{2}, \lambda)}{\partial x_{2}} = \frac{5}{x_{2}} - \lambda \]
Setting these derivatives equal to zero allows us to solve for the optimal values that satisfy both the objective function and the constraints. Solving the FOC equations alongside the constraint gives us the solution space for our optimization problem.
Quasi-linear Function
A quasi-linear function plays an important role in economics, especially in consumer theory. These functions typically have one linear term and one non-linear term. In our exercise, the objective function \( y=x_{1}+5 \ln x_{2} \) is quasi-linear because it has a linear term in \( x_1 \) and a non-linear logarithmic term in \( x_2 \).

Quasi-linear functions illustrate how consumers might make trade-offs between goods when one good can be consumed in large quantities without much effect on utility (the linear term), while increases in the other good lead to diminishing marginal returns to utility (the logarithmic term). They are particularly useful for analyzing consumer behavior under different types of market conditions and income levels.
Consumer Theory
Consumer theory examines how individuals decide to spend their income on the consumption of goods and services. It involves concepts like utilities, preferences, budget constraints, and consumption bundles.

In our exercise, the constrained maximization problem can be viewed through the lens of consumer theory, where \( x_1 \) and \( x_2 \) represent two different goods, and \( k \) is akin to the consumer's income or wealth. Consumers must decide the optimal bundle of \( x_1 \) and \( x_2 \) that provides the maximum utility, symbolized by \( y \), within their budget constraint \( k \). When determining solutions for different values of \( k \), we effectively analyze how changes in income affect consumption choices - a critical aspect of consumer theory.
Lagrange Multiplier
The Lagrange multiplier, \( \lambda \), is more than just an additional variable in the Lagrangian function; it holds significant economic interpretation. It represents the change in the maximum value of the objective function for a one-unit increase in the constraint bound.

In our example, observing how the multiplier changes as we solve for different values of \( k \) can reveal how sensitive our optimal solution is to the constraint. When \( k \) changes, the value of the multiplier could provide insight into how restrictive the budget constraint is on the consumer's utility maximization problem. The Lagrange multiplier plays a critical role not only in solving the constrained optimization but also in understanding the underlying economic principles of the problem.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The height of a ball that is thrown straight up with a certain force is a function of the time ( \(t\) ) from which it is released given by \(f(t)=-0.5 g t^{2}+40 t\) (where \(g\) is a constant determined by gravity). a. How does the value of \(t\) at which the height of the ball is at a maximum depend on the parameter \(g\) ? b. Use your answer to part (a) to describe how maximum height changes as the parameter \(g\) changes. c. Use the envelope theorem to answer part (b) directly. d. On the Earth \(g=32\), but this value varies somewhat around the globe. If two locations had gravitational constants that differed by \(0.1,\) what would be the difference in the maximum height of a ball tossed in the two places?

The definition of the variance of a random variable can be used to show a number of additional results. a. Show that \(\operatorname{Var}(x)=E\left(x^{2}\right)-[E(x)]^{2}\) b. Use Markov's inequality (Problem \(2.14 \mathrm{d}\) ) to show that if \(x\) can take on only non-negative values, \\[ P\left[\left(x-\mu_{x}\right) \geq k\right] \leq \frac{\sigma_{x}^{2}}{k^{2}} \\] This result shows that there are limits on how often a random variable can be far from its expected value. If \(k=h \sigma\) this result also says that \\[ P\left[\left(x-\mu_{x}\right) \geq h \sigma\right] \leq \frac{1}{h^{2}} \\]. Therefore, for example, the probability that a random variable can be more than two standard deviations from its expected value is always less than \(0.25 .\) The theoretical result is called Chebyshev's inequality. c. Equation 2.197 showed that if two (or more) random variables are independent, the variance of their sum is equal to the sum of their variances. Use this result to show that the sum of \(n\) independent random variables, each of which has expected value \(\mu\) and variance \(\sigma^{2},\) has expected value \(m \mu\) and variance \(n \sigma^{2}\). Show also that the average of these \(n\) random variables (which is also a random variable) will have expected value \(\mu\) and variance \(\sigma^{2} / n\). This is sometimes called the law of large numbers-that is, the variance of an average shrinks down as more independent variables are included. d. Use the result from part (c) to show that if \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) are independent random variables each with the same expected value and variance, the variance of a weighted average of the two \(X=k x_{1}+(1-k) x_{2}, 0 \leq k \leq 1\) is minimized when \(k=0.5\) How much is the variance of this sum reduced by setting \(k\) properly relative to other possible values of \(k\) ? e. How would the result from part (d) change if the two variables had unequal variances?

Suppose that \(f(x, y)=x y .\) Find the maximum value for \(f\) if \(x\) and \(y\) are constrained to sum to \(1 .\) Solve this problem in two ways: by substitution and by using the Lagrange multiplier method.

Show that if \(f\left(x_{1}, x_{2}\right)\) is a concave function then it is also a quasi-concave function. Do this by comparing Equation 2.114 (defining quasi-concavity) with Equation 2.98 (defining concavity). Can you give an intuitive reason for this result? Is the converse of the statement true? Are quasi-concave functions necessarily concave? If not, give a counterexample.

Suppose a firm's total revenues depend on the amount produced ( \(q\) ) according to the function \\[ R=70 q-q^{2} \\] Total costs also depend on \(q\) \\[ C=q^{2}+30 q+100 \\] a. What level of output should the firm produce to maximize profits \((R-C) ?\) What will profits be? b. Show that the second-order conditions for a maximum are satisfied at the output level found in part (a). c. Does the solution calculated here obey the "marginal revenue equals marginal cost" rule? Explain.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free