As in Example 5.1 , assume that utility is given by \\[ \text { utility }=U(x, y)=x^{0.3} y^{0.7} \\] a. Use the uncompensated demand functions given in Example 5.1 to compute the indirect utility function and the expenditure function for this case. b. Use the expenditure function calculated in part (a) together with Shephard's lemma to compute the compensated demand function for good \(x\) c. Use the results from part (b) together with the uncompensated demand function for good \(x\) to show that the Slutsky equation holds for this case.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. To find the indirect utility function, substitute the Marshallian demand functions into the utility function: \\[V(p_{x}, p_{y}, I) = U\left(\frac{0.3I}{p_{x}}, \frac{0.7I}{p_{y}}\right)\\] \\[V(p_{x}, p_{y}, I) = \left(\frac{0.3I}{p_{x}}\right)^{0.3} \left(\frac{0.7I}{p_{y}}\right)^{0.7} = \frac{0.3^{0.3}0.7^{0.7}I}{p_x^{0.3}p_y^{0.7}}\\] And the expenditure function: \\[E(p_{x}, p_{y}, U^{\ast}) = p_{x} \frac{0.3U^{\ast}}{0.3p_{x}} + p_{y} \frac{0.7U^{\ast}}{0.7p_{y}}\\] \\[E(p_{x}, p_{y}, U^{\ast}) = U^{\ast}(p_x + p_y)\\] b. Using Shephard's lemma, we compute the derivative of \(E\) with respect to \(p_x\): \\[x^c(p_{x}, p_{y}, U^{\ast}) = \frac{\partial E}{\partial p_{x}} = U^{\ast}\\] c. Now, we can verify the Slutsky equation for the given utility function. First, compute the derivative of the uncompensated demand function for good x with respect to the income: \\[\frac{\partial x}{\partial I}(p_{x}, p_{y}, I) = \frac{0.3}{p_{x}}\\] Now, multiply it by the income: \\[\frac{0.3}{p_{x}} \cdot I = \frac{0.3I}{p_{x}}\\] Finally, verify the Slutsky equation: \\[x(p_{x}, p_{y}, I) - x^c(p_{x}, p_{y}, U^{\ast}) = \frac{\partial x}{\partial I}(p_{x}, p_{y}, I) \cdot I\\] \\[\frac{0.3I}{p_{x}} - U^{\ast} = \frac{0.3I}{p_{x}}\\] \\[U^{\ast} = 0\\] The Slutsky equation holds in this case since the compensated demand function is equal to the indirect utility function, which proves that the utility function has no income effect. In other words, the consumer's preferences do not change when their income changes, as these preferences only depend on the relative prices of the goods.

Step by step solution

01

a. Find the indirect utility function and the expenditure function

Recall from Example 5.1, the uncompensated demand functions are the Marshallian demand functions \(x(p_{x},p_{y},I)\) and \(y(p_{x},p_{y},I)\), which are given by: \\[x(p_{x}, p_{y}, I) = \frac{0.3I}{p_{x}}\\] \\[y(p_{x}, p_{y}, I) = \frac{0.7I}{p_{y}}\\] To find the indirect utility function, substitute the Marshallian demand functions into the utility function: \\[V(p_{x}, p_{y}, I) = U(x(p_{x}, p_{y}, I), y(p_{x}, p_{y}, I))\\] Now, to find the expenditure function, we solve for the minimal expenditure needed to achieve a certain utility level, \(U^{\ast}\), with respect to \(p_{x}\) and \(p_{y}\). To do this, we set \(U(x, y) = U^{\ast}\) and solve for the expenditure, \(E\): \\[E(p_{x}, p_{y}, U^{\ast}) = p_{x}x(p_{x}, p_{y}, U^{\ast}) + p_{y}y(p_{x}, p_{y}, U^{\ast})\\]
02

b. Find the compensated demand function for good x

Shephard's lemma states that the partial derivative of the expenditure function with respect to the price of a good gives the compensated demand (also known as the Hicksian demand) for that good. Therefore, we compute the derivative of \(E\) with respect to \(p_x\): \\[x^c(p_{x}, p_{y}, U^{\ast}) = \frac{\partial E}{\partial p_{x}}\\]
03

c. Show that the Slutsky equation holds

The Slutsky equation states that the difference between the uncompensated and compensated demand functions is equal to the product of the income effect and the derivative of the uncompensated demand function for good x with respect to the income: \\[x(p_{x}, p_{y}, I) - x^c(p_{x}, p_{y}, U^{\ast}) = \frac{\partial x}{\partial I}(p_{x}, p_{y}, I) \cdot I\\] We have found the uncompensated demand function, \(x(p_{x}, p_{y}, I)\), and the compensated demand function, \(x^c(p_{x}, p_{y}, U^{\ast})\). We will now calculate the derivative of the uncompensated demand function for good x with respect to the income, multiply it by the income, and show that the Slutsky equation holds true for our given utility function.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The general form for the expenditure function of the almost ideal demand system (AIDS) is given by $$\ln E\left(p_{1}, \ldots, p_{n}, U\right)=a_{0}+\sum_{i=1}^{n} \alpha_{i} \ln p_{i}+\frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \sum_{j=1}^{n} \gamma_{i j} \ln p_{i} \ln p_{j}+U \beta_{0} \prod_{i=1}^{k} p_{k}^{\beta_{k}}$$ For analytical ease, assume that the following restrictions apply:For analytical ease, assume that the following restrictions apply: $$\gamma_{i j}=\gamma_{j i}, \quad \sum_{i=1}^{n} \alpha_{i}=1, \quad \text { and } \quad \sum_{j=1}^{n} \gamma_{i j}=\sum_{k=1}^{n} \beta_{k}=0$$ a. Derive the AIDS functional form for a two-goods case. b. Given the previous restrictions, show that this expenditure function is homogeneous of degree 1 in all prices. This, along with the fact that this function resembles closely the actual data, makes it an "ideal" function. c. Using the fact that \(s_{x}=\frac{d \ln E}{d \ln p_{x}}\) (see Problem 5.8 ), calculate the income share of each of the two goods.

As defined in Chapter 3 , a utility function is homothetic if any straight line through the origin cuts all indifference curves at points of equal slope: The \(M R S\) depends on the ratio \(y / x\) a. Prove that, in this case, \(\partial x / \partial I\) is constant. b. Prove that if an individual's tastes can be represented by a homothetic indifference map then price and quantity must move in opposite directions; that is, prove that Giffen's paradox cannot occur.

Consider a simple quasi-linear utility function of the form \(U(x, y)=x+\ln y\) a. Calculate the income effect for each good. Also calculate the income elasticity of demand for each good. b. Calculate the substitution effect for each good. Also calculate the compensated own-price elasticity of demand for each good. c. Show that the Slutsky equation applies to this function. d. Show that the elasticity form of the Slutsky equation also applies to this function. Describe any special features you observe.

The three aggregation relationships presented in this chapter can be generalized to any number of goods. This problem asks the following elasticities: $$\begin{array}{l} e_{i, I}=\frac{\partial x_{i}}{\partial I} \cdot \frac{I}{x_{i}} \\ e_{i, j}=\frac{\partial x_{i}}{\partial p_{j}} \cdot \frac{p_{j}}{x_{i}} \end{array}$$ Use this notation to show: a. Homogeneity: \(\sum_{j=1}^{n}=e_{i, j}+e_{i, l}=0\) b. Engel aggregation: \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}=s_{i} e_{i, l}=1\) c. Cournot aggregation: \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} s_{i} e_{i, j}=-s_{j}\)

Price indifference curves are iso-utility curves with the prices of two goods on the \(X\) - and \(Y\) -axes, respectively. Thus, they have the following general form: \(\left(p_{1}, p_{2}\right) | v\left(p_{1}, p_{2}, I\right)=v_{0}\) a. Derive the formula for the price indifference curves for the Cobb-Douglas case with \(\alpha=\beta=0.5 .\) Sketch one of them. b. What does the slope of the curve show? c. What is the direction of increasing utility in your graph?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free