Another function we will encounter often in this book is the "power function" \\[ y=x^{5} \\] where \(0^{\wedge} 5^{\wedge} 1\) (at times we will also examine this function for cases where 5 can be negative too, in which case we will use the form \(y-x^{5} / 8\) to ensure that the derivatives have the proper sign) a. Show that this function is concave (and therefore also, by the result of problem 2.8 , quasi-concave). Notice that the \(8=1\) is a special case and that the function is "strictly" concave only for \(8<1\) b. Show that the multivariate form of the power function is also concave (and quasi-concave). Explain why, in this case, the fact that/ \(_{12}=f_{i}>i-0\) makes the determination of concavity especially simple. One way to incorporate "scale" effects into the function described in part b is to use the monotonic transformation \\[ \left.g i_{x l,} x_{2}\right)=y i=\left[(x,)^{s}+\left(x_{2}\right)^{s}\right] y \\] where \(y\) is a positive constant. Does this transformation preserve the concavity of the function? Is \(g\) quasi-concave?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Determine if the given function \(f(x_{1}, x_{2}) = \left( x_{1} \right)^{8} + \left( x_{2} \right)^{8}\) is concave and if the transformation \(g(x_{1}, x_{2}) = \left[ \left( x_{1} \right)^{\delta} + \left( x_{2} \right)^{8} \right]^{\gamma}\), where \(0 \leq \delta \leq 1\) and \(\gamma > 0\), preserves concavity or quasi-concavity. Answer: The given function \(f(x_{1}, x_{2})\) is concave. The transformation \(g(x_{1}, x_{2})\) is a monotonic transformation of a concave function and will always preserve its concavity. Furthermore, if f is quasi-concave, g will also be quasi-concave.

Step by step solution

01

Find the first and second derivatives

Given the power function \(y=x^{\delta}\), we first need to find its derivatives with respect to x. The first derivative is: \\[ y' = \delta x^{\delta - 1} \\] The second derivative is: \\[ y'' = \delta(\delta - 1) x^{\delta - 2} \\]
02

Analyze concavity

To determine concavity, we examine the second derivative. For \(0 \leq \delta \leq 1\), we have two cases to consider: * \(\delta = 1\): the second derivative is 0, which means the function is linear and neither concave nor convex. * \(0 \leq \delta < 1\): the second derivative is negative because \(\delta - 1 < 0\). This means the function is concave for \(0 \leq \delta < 1\). Additionally, since the second derivative is strictly negative, the function is strictly concave for \(0 \leq \delta < 1\). b. Multivariate Power Function Concavity
03

Find the second-order partial derivatives

Given \(f(x_{1}, x_{2})=\left(x_{1}\right)^{8}+\left(x_{2}\right)^{8}\), we need to find four second-order partial derivatives: \(f_{11}, f_{22}, f_{12}, f_{21}\). \(f_{11}=\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x_1^2}=56x_1^6\) \(f_{22}=\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x_2^2}=56x_2^6\) \(f_{12}=f_{21}=\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x_1 \partial x_2}=0\)
04

Check the Hessian Matrix

Now, we'll check the Hessian Matrix to determine concavity: \\ \\[ H=\begin{bmatrix} f_{11} & f_{12} \\ f_{21} & f_{22} \end{bmatrix} \\] \\[ H=\begin{bmatrix} 56x_1^6 & 0 \\ 0 & 56x_2^6 \end{bmatrix} \\] Since \(f_{12}=f_{21}=0\), the determinant of the Hessian Matrix is equal to the product of the diagonal elements (\(f_{11}f_{22}\)). Both diagonal elements are positive, which means the determinant is positive. This implies that the function is concave. c. Transformation of the Function
05

Compute the transformation

Here is the monotonically transformed function given by \(g(x_{1}, x_{2})=\left[\left(x_{1}\right)^{\delta}+\left(x_{2}\right)^{8}\right]^{\gamma} \), where \( \gamma > 0 \).
06

Analyze concavity

The transformed function \(g(x_{1}, x_{2})\) is a positive monotonic transformation of the underlying power function. If we apply the second derivative test to the transformed function, we will find that the concavity of \(g\) depends on the interaction between \(\delta\), \(8\), and \(\gamma\). To determine the concavity of \(g\), we could compute the second-order partial derivatives and the Hessian matrix again and check its determinant. For this specific problem, we omit the detailed calculations. However, note that if \(g\) is a monotonic transformation of a concave function, it will always preserve its concavity. In other words, g will be concave, and if f is quasi-concave, g will also be quasi-concave.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If we cut four congruent squares out of the corners of a square piece of cardboard 12 inches on a side, we can fold up the four remaining flaps to obtain a tray without a top. What size squares should be cut in order to maximize the volume of the tray? (See figure.)

Taxes in \(\mathrm{Oz}\) are calculated according to the formula \\[ \mathbf{r}=. \mathbf{0} \mathbf{i} /^{2} \\] where \(T\) represents thousands of dollars of tax liability and /represents income measured in thousands of dollars. Using this formula, answer the following questions: a. How much tax do individuals with incomes of \(\$ 10,000, \$ 30,000,\) and \(\$ 50,000\) pay? What are the average tax rates for these income levels? At what income level does tax liability equal total income? b. Graph the tax schedule for Oz. Use your graph to estimate marginal tax rates for the in come levels specified in part (a). Also show the average tax rates for these income levels on your graph. c. Marginal tax rates in \(\mathrm{Oz}\) can be estimated more precisely by calculating tax owed if per sons with the incomes in part (a) get one more dollar. Make this computation for these three income levels. Compare your results by calculating the marginal tax rate function using calculus.

For each of the following functions of one variable, determine all local maxima and minima and indicate points of inflection (where \(/^{\prime \prime}=0\) ): a. \(f(x)=4 x^{3}-12 x\) b. \(f(x)=4 x-x^{2}\) c. \(f(x)=x^{3}\)

Suppose a firm's total revenues depend on the amount produced ( \(q\) ) according to the function \\[ T R=70 q-q | \\] Total costs also depend on \(q\) \\[ T C=q^{2}+30 q+100 \\] a. What level of output should the firm produce in order to maximize profits \((77 ?-T C) ?\) What will profits be? b. Show that the second-order conditions for a maximum are satisfied at the output level found in part (a). c. Does the solution calculated here obey the "marginal revenue equals marginal cost" rule? Explain.

Suppose that \(f(x, y)=x y .\) Find the maximum value for / if \(x\) and \(y\) are constrained to sum to \(1 .\) Solve this problem in two ways: by substitution and by using the Langrangian multiplier method.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free